Ashikaider

On the subject of pulp, the magazines had been around for for decades before the tropes that constitute the modern conception of 'pulp'. In fact, CoC can be considered as a type/genre of pulp, and pulp from the late 1910s to the 1920s has the possibility of being different from what became popular in the 30s. In fact, at one point there were people who considered the tonal change of pulp to hard sf in Astounding magazine to be the beginning of the 'Golden Age of Science Fiction'. That's all well and fine, but it does disregard the hard work of the writers beforehand who quite literally attempting to figure out just exactly what the genre should do, and a lot of it was simply throwing stuff against the wall to see what stuck. Hence clunky early nomenclatures such as 'scientifiction'. While alot of the materials may be hard to find, scans of science fiction magazine covers are now widely available online, looking at those can give you a rough idea of how the genre developed during the 20s-30s. (I managed to acquire some books of pre-hard SF and combined with my impressions of the scanned covers, has shaped how I envision early pulp sf. While not necessarily pulp, the Jeeves novels and Agatha Christie's works came out concurrently, and show a nice parallel between themselves and mystery/crime pulps (which were a major seller at the time, and feature early work of writers who became more well-known as novelists, and featured the origins of the Film Noir genre in print form.)

I agree with your suggestion about Sanity. It wouldn't come up constantly, as in a regular CoC game, but some of the stuff that could crop up could be a bit much for average person of a hundred years ago, even if they were veterans of the Great War. So your stress system might be what's needed there. I used to play/run a lot of Savage Worlds, and the included chart for characters who failed a Guts/Spirit check had some great reactions to not being able to handle weird stuff, with my favorite being that the character goes insane, and comes out of the other side able to function normally, but still showing some twitchiness under the surface. (Much like Ash in the later Evil Dead/Army of Darkness episodes, especially in the recent tv series. When he has to fight, he becomes confident, competent, and charismatic, yet when given time to himself, that's when his sanity wavers).

I think Pulp Cthulhu might be a little too action-packed for what I have in mind. Like I said in the first post, I just want to do simple mysteries with average people getting caught up in the weird science of the nineteen-teens and the roaring 20s. I realized that I mentioned cliffhangers in the first post, having thought about it, I realised that one can do cliffhangers that aren't physically perilous, but could cause complications. One example I thought of was of Poirot (it might be interesting to run CoC for post Holmesian mysteries), going to the store and finding out that the store has sold out of the mustache wax that Poirot uses. It's a crisis of sorts, because Poirot is an immaculate and fastidious groomer, and a setback like this one could be troublesome. In addition, it could be used as the impetus for a new investigation - - did the store, which usually keeps the wax in stock coincidentally run out of stock, or did someone else buy it all up? Another is that of a reporter calling their editor, only to find out that they haven't checked in for quite a while, and if they don't have something to turn in by the end of the day or the next, then they're at risk of getting fired. (actually, this one could work in a regular CoC game). Basically mini-events/situations that provide peril not from a physical standpoint, but from the characterisation or in-game standing of a particular character.

Well, the one thing that I can say about a lot of early pulp sf is that with the exception of interplanetary stories, a large majority of them were set in a then contemporaneous setting, with the only major changes being the subject of the story, beit a mad science invention, a normal piece of technology running amok, or an alien visitor/invader. So a roughly historically accurate setting would be something that would fit this idea like a glove. Even some of the SF written in 40s had a similar feeling to them. One example of this would be Henry Kuttner's "Robots Have No Tails", a collection of science fiction stories about a scientist that can only invent the really creative stuff when he's drunk, the kicker usually being that he has no idea how he did it when he becomes sober. The main impetus of these stories aside from the outlandish is that the protagonist has to figure out exactly what the latest invention was for, and if he needs to figure out something to keep it in line. The idea would be to have have a historically accurate starting point, and to let things go on from there.

I recently ordered the new starter set (which should arrive on Thursday). My main reason for this was that due to circumstances most of my game books are packed away and in some cases, in storage. Also, sometimes I just want to buy new gaming stuff, and recent years output has failed to pique my interest (one of more recent acquisitions I made was the Star Wars D6 anniversary set, which was fun to run, and is probably fun to play with. The others were something of a disappointment - - one didn't pay off with material, and the other felt like there was too much to do to have something that I'd want to work with) I've dabbled in CoC in the past, having run the Haunting with a used copy of the 5e book, and played in an on-line game over Google 6-8 years ago. The system generally does what it says on the tin, although some concessions might have to be made in order to keep an investigation going (the old trap of the game stalling because a player failed to find the crucial clue). However, while I want to do something with the system, I'm just not in the mood to deal with the Mythos right now. (I've been a long time Lovecraft fan since hearing about him on an episode of Real Ghostbusters). So my idea was two fold. Keep most of the mechanics as is, but instead of horror, the game becomes one of investigating 1920s pulp science fiction (which is quite possibly a completely different beastie from what a lot of people might be expecting). (The other idea was to go for a slightly pulpier version of 20s Detective fiction like Poirot or Jeeves and Wooster, but with added cliffhangers). SF in the 20s involved prototypal mad scientists, rampaging robots, journeys to microscopic realms, and vaguely described technology. (Lovecraft dabbled in this with "From Beyond"). The basic premise starts out the same, with people drawn somewhere for various reasons - - the scholar/scientist is looking for their colleague who hasn't responded in quite a while, the gangster who coming to collect on money or is scouting the location for a possible location to build a distillery, etc. But now have to find out what what happened, and deal with whatever has gone wrong, which may not be at that location. A possible new rule could be for cliffhangers. At certain times during the session, the keeper, wanting a short break, sets up a situation, and asks the players to write down how they would react to the situation, and after the break, the cliffhanger would be resolved. Aside from that, I could see some random scenario tables to establish the basis of the adventure, and diagram on how to set up the mystery in the scenario that makes sense logically, and let it develop naturally on the player's side of things. Thoughts? Opinions? I think that I have an interesting idea, but am not completely sure how to proceed with it.