Jump to content

olskool

Members
  • Content Count

    104
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by olskool

  1. We always wanted to differentiate Spirit Magic from Sorcery and Rune/Divine Magic. We gave Spirit Magic a duration of MINUTES equal to your Magic Points at the time of casting. Have 2 Magic Points left? Your spell's duration is 2 minutes. Have 15 mp left? You get 15 MINUTES of run time on that Protection spell. The Shaman got to use his POW so his duration never changed (a perk for being a Shaman). Divine/Rune Magic lasted minutes for Initiates and HOURS when cast by a Rune Priest. The difference in runtimes between different "tiers" of casters proved to be especially popular reasons to take the restrictions those higher tiers had to endure during play (like the DEX x 5 limits on skills).
  2. olskool

    System Suggestions wanted!

    I have to give Mythras the shoutout here as being easier to explain to new players. A less "polished" version would be Legend by Mongoose Publishing. I really like the ACTIONS system Mythras uses as well as their Special Effects.
  3. olskool

    Do you use miniatures?

    I have that exact mapboard myself. I also have the square/grid version too. Nowadays, I also use standard sized (8.5" X 11.5" ?) 50 and 100 sheet pads/tablets with 1" grids (available at Staples) to draw individual interior rooms on. If I plan on using them a lot, I will laminate them. For most adventures, I just leave them as is so I can draw on them during play. For markers, I have seen Checkers, Chess pieces, and even Monopoly pieces used to represent combatants. The coolest "minis" I have seen for a GM who travels to games is the 25mm cardstock prints that fold in half to show the front and back of the Character and which "clip" into a plastic Hex Base to stand upright. You can carry a ton of those and swapping bases is very easy.
  4. olskool

    RuneQuest 3 - House Rules

    I came up with a simplified way to figure damage based on surplus STR for a weapon. EVERY weapon is given a STR and DEX requirement and then each weapon is designated as a LIGHT or HEAVY weapon. To determine your Damage Bonus, you SUBTRACT your STR from the weapon's required STR. To this "SURPLUS STR" total, you may add 1 point for every 10 full points of SIZ above a size of 10 that the creature possesses (so a SIZ 31 Troll would add 2 to STR). You then take this "MODIFIED SURPLUS STR" and give the character a +1 bonus to Damage for every 10 points of Surplus STR for LIGHT Weapons and a +1 bonus to Damage for every 5 points of Surplus STR for HEAVY Weapons. This system prevents the "double bonus" of a high STR character getting a big Damage Bonus IN ADDITION TO being able to wield larger and heavier weapons (due to STR requirements).
  5. olskool

    Movement Rate

    In the 10th Mountain, we had them beat. Every 3 months we did a 30-mile road march in 6-7 hours (you'd better NOT take 😎 with an 80lb ruck. You could only get it done if you "Airborne Shuffled" (kind of a slow jog) on the flats. I really mind didn't the weekly 10-mile humps after doing a couple of 30's.
  6. olskool

    An advance look at the RuneQuest slipcase

    Are they ever going to have a slipcase set with the Runequest AND Glorantha books TOGETHER (in a single case)... in Leatherette. 😁 And could Chaosium maybe... just maybe... put a copy out with a 16" X 24" page size format (with big print because I'm getting old) and a gilded bronze hardcover complete with dual leather straps, bronze or brass buckles, and a red silk bookmarker so I can rest a copy of RUNEQUEST on a podium in my game room like it was a giant Gutenberg Bible?😎
  7. olskool

    RuneQuest 6 vs BRP for Base System

    I have borrowed things from EVERY edition of Runequest for my homebrew.
  8. olskool

    Movement Rate

    I ditched conventional Movement AND the basic Strike Rank system for one where each SR equals one second of time. My movement rates were based on METERS PER SECOND (SR) and consisted of (for a human): Sprint: 8m/SR Run: 6m/SR Trot: 4m/SR Walk: 2m/SR Crawl: 1m/SR
  9. olskool

    Not sure how I feel...

    I would have my players put an Experience Point/Dot after each physical Attribute (STR, DEX, CON) every game session. Once they had acquired 10 EXP, I'd allow them to trade those points in for a chance to improve that stat. They'd roll a 1D20 (for a human, I used different die sizes for non-humans) and attempt to roll OVER their current Attribute. If they succeeded, that Attribute would increase by one point. Successful or not, the 10 EXP were used and lost. This provided a reasonable balance between allowing weak Attributes to increase and limiting the chance for higher Attributes to increase without imposing an arbitrary rule on the improvement of those high-level Attributes. Of course, I allowed Attribute improvement (including mental ones) because I used an Aging Chart that required the players to make "Aging Saves" against their Attributes (using the same Roll-Over Mechanic) once they hit 40 (for a human) and every 5 years afterward. I also allowed disease and certain poisons or magic abilities to "drain" Attributes during play. The Vampire would drain both CON and STR with their bite while the Wraith could age you 1D6 years with its touch. Thus I had Attributes in a minor state of "flux" during play.
  10. olskool

    Best Rules for Comparing Successful Rolls

    Yes, I'm aware of this. My issue was always if you ran out of ACTIONS or you used your last ACTION for something else (casting a spell, readying a new weapon) and your opponent scored a success on an UNOPPOSED ROLL, he gets to not only hit you for damage but inflict some kind of Special Effect as well (some of which are "game changing"). All of this just because you run out of ACTIONS. It felt more than a little "unfair" to slower characters and magic users trying to cast spells with their actions who were subsequently attacked (often with ranged weapons). My bumping the selection of an SE up to a roll of 1/2 Skill or less your Skill reduces the frequency of SEs and makes them feel more like the Special Effects I believe that they should be. This is just my opinion of course, and your RQ6 may vary. This desire to make SEs feel "Special" is why I divide them up between THREE levels of Success (instead of the two levels in RQ6).
  11. olskool

    Best Rules for Comparing Successful Rolls

    Yes. I give the benefit to the player since I'm dropping this from 20% of the roll for a normal Special Success (impale).
  12. olskool

    Best Rules for Comparing Successful Rolls

    Well, you should consider that "borrowed." ...(Sighs)... looks like I have another reason to buy Revolution now, and I just ponied up for RQG, D&D5e (not really impressed by this despite my nephew's accolades), and 3 softback editions of Mythras as Christmas presents. I just wish my local gaming shop had a hardcopy to buy. I am admittedly a "Dead Tree Grognard" and hate PDFs despite my "digital" nephew's best efforts. He does seem to enjoy borrowing all my "dead tree" RPGs Though, pretty odd for someone so attached to digital media? I guess I'll have to look into a LULU printing like I did with Mythras.
  13. olskool

    Best Rules for Comparing Successful Rolls

    I did this too but I took a page from the new CoC and I changed the success levels to expedite play. I use the Special Effects from Runequest 6 but I didn't like the "Effect hunting" that occurs with the "stock/RAW" system. Therefore, I broke the Success Levels down to the following steps. Simple Success: This is a roll under the skill involved and doesn't generate any added benefit in the form of Special Effects. The highest roll between two Simple Successes wins. Special Success: This is a roll under HALF (rounding up) of the Skill involved. It beats a Simple Success AND generates a Special Effect from the list of SEs for a Special Success (further segregated by Parry and Attack). High roll wins between two Special Successes. Outstanding Success: This represents the old Special Success (ie Impales, Slashes, and Crushes) BUT it is only 1/10th of the Skill rounding UP. Thus a Skill of 58% would achieve an Outstanding Success on a roll of 6 or less. There is a list of even more effective Special Effects (segregated by Weapon Type, Attack, and Parry) for the Outstanding Success. Those SEs can be "game-changers" like Impale, Crush, Slash, Riposte, Disarm, and Trip. Outstanding Success always beats a Simple or Special Success. Critical Success: This represents the old Critical Hit and occurs ONLY ON DOUBLES ROLLED UNDER SKILL. Thus a skill of 60% would Critical on a roll of 11, 22, 33, 44 and 55. This level of success allows the best Special Effects in RQ6. Special Effects like Sunder Weapon, Do Double Max Damage, Bypass Armor, Choose Location, and Compel Surrender all are found in this success range. Criticals beat all comers except other Criticals. Fumbles: The dreaded Fumble occurs on DOUBLES ABOVE THE SKILL LEVEL. Thus that 60% skill above would Fumble on a roll of 66, 77, 88, 99, or 00. Fumbles also have their own list of Special Effects BUT the opposing player picks the Fumble. A player will pick for a GM's Fumble and vice versa. Some of the Special Effects include Riposte, Hit Self, Hit Companion, Drop Weapon/Shield and Trip and Fall. I find the math much faster and easier with this system and dividing up the Special Effects between the Success Levels reduces the "Analysis Paralysis" that new players often suffer when playing a version of RuneQuest with such Special Effects included. I hope this helps you out in your own game.
  14. olskool

    Greg Stafford Condolence Thread

    I hope you find the answers to those questions we all ask but never have answered. You shall be missed. Godspeed Sir!
  15. olskool

    Morocanth

    The REAL QUESTION is... Is Chaosium still suggesting that Morokanth are Vegan? 😒
  16. Retired Marine and Movie Actor R Lee Ermey died on Sunday. May you rest in peace Gunny!
  17. olskool

    RQ3 SR vs Time

    Mikus; We had issues with RQ2/RQ3's Strike Rank system too. We eventually began using a Time (ROUGHLY) = SR System that still used Strike Ranks but was randomized and counted DOWN to zero. Each Strike Rank is loosely equal to 1 second's worth of activity in our system. We combined this with a Weapon reach system and it worked pretty well. Here's a rough overview of our "initiative system." REACH: All weapons have a Reach in meters that indicates how far away you can attack a target. The range of each Reach Class was; Short Reach = 1-meter attack range. Examples include fists, daggers, kicks. Medium Reach = 2-meter attack range. This is the "default Reach." Examples include swords (both short and long), axes, hammers, maces, etc... Long Reach = 3-meter attack range. Examples include poleaxes, short Spears, and morningstar/war flails. Extreme Reach = 4-meter attack range. Examples include whips and long spears. SIZ doesn't impact Strike Ranks anymore BUT it does affect Reach. For every 10 SIZ or fraction thereof over 20 a creature has, you add 1 meter to its Reach. Thus a Troll using a dagger has a Reach of 2 meters with it. Reach also assumes that the attacker is using some movement to position himself for a better attack. That movement is considered part of his weapon's Reach. A longer weapon's Reach is often balanced by the fact that it is heavier and bulkier and therefore requires MORE Strike Ranks to make an attack with (this is dealt with below). Now onto actual Strike Ranks. Strike Ranks: To determine a Character's base Strike Rank, you just divide DEX by 4 rounding up (please note that our characteristics are determined by 3D6+2 Rolls and range from 5 to 20). This gives you the character's Base Strike Rank. To determine the actual Strike Rank each round, we roll 1D6 and ADD that roll to the character's Base Strike Rank. Strike Ranks can be reduced by wounds, fatigue, and encumbrance. This Strike Rank then COUNTS DOWN instead of up. Different actions take different Strike Ranks but each Strike Rank is LOOSELY based on 1 second's worth of activity. If you want to know how long something takes, just time it. The Declaration Phase: In this phase, everyone narratively describes what they are doing and the SR Cost of each of those actions is calculated. This is where Reach affects things. If a person cannot currently reach the desired target, they must move into position to attack. Responding to attacks with parries or dodges also take time as well as drawing weapons and readying spells. Examples of the number of Strike Ranks various actions take are listed below: Attack (small light weapons like daggers) =1SR. Attack (normal weapons like swords) = 2SR. Attack (heavy weapons like poleaxes, hammers, and great axes) = 3SR Attack (large or very heavy weapons like the morningstar and long spear) = 4SR Missile Attack, *Short Range = 1SR Missile Attack, *Medium Range = 2SR Missile Attack, *Long Range = 3SR Missile Attack, *Extreme Range = 4SR Readying/Loading a Missile = 5SR Drawing a Weapon = 1/2 the weapon's attack SR (rounding up). For example, a dagger (SR1) takes 1SR to ready. A great axe (SR3) takes 2SR to ready. Changing an action requires a 2SR "hesitation" from the point you desire to change. For example, you want to attack the Trollkin on SR5 but another character kills him. changing to another target will take 2SRs. Changing from melee to spell casting will require a 5SR "Concentration/focusing" action. Parrying/Dodging require a 1SR Reaction to parry and recover. The desire to defend MUST be declared in this phase and the character loses the SR even if the attack fails. The Hard Look. Characters trying to spot hidden or invisible enemies, using detection spells and Spirit Sight must expend 1SR to "look around." They can examine the 3 hexsides that they are facing. Looking behind you costs 1 ADDITIONAL SR per hexside you check. Magic costs 1SR per POW Point you cast for Spirit and Divine Magic. Sorcery costs 1SR per Manipulation/Shaping X the Intensity you cast at. For example, casting an Intensity 3 spell with Range and Duration Shapings would take 6SR to do. Movement [crawling, climbing, sneaking] = 1SR per meter traveled. Movement [walking] = 1SR per 2 meters traveled. Attack penalties may apply at the GM's discretion. Movement [trotting] = 1SR per 3 meters traveled. Attack penalties usually apply. Movement [running] = 1SR per 4 meters traveled. Attack penalties WILL apply. A character cannot go from a standing start to Running without a skill check (Athletics). Movement [dropping to ground or rising from crouch/sitting] = 1SR. Movement [rising from prone] = 2SR. It is fairly easy to figure what the SR Cost of other actions will be from this list. I then record all the actions on a dry-erase sheet with 12 lines (we used RQ2's 12 strike rank system with RQ3). At the start of the Action Phase, we would simply go down through the SR chart and resolve all the actions in order down to zero. Actions could "roll over" into following rounds. In fact, this was common for magic and reloading missile weapons like crossbows. Finally, we would finalize the "bookkeeping in the Resolution phase. One easy way to keep track of SRs is to give everyone either checkers or poker chips for their SR. They then give you back those chips as they declare their actions. This helps new player a great deal as they have a visual reference of how many SRs they have to work with. I would also swap out RED poker chips (our default colored chips) for BLACK chips when the Character "owed" SRs to complete an action that took more than ONE round. This was a visual cue to collect the needed SRs during the Declaration Phase of the next round. I hope this gives you some "insight" into an alternative method of doing initiative in RuneQuest. *We use a differing missile combat system where the weapon's Base Range is divided into FOUR (mostly) EQUAL Range Bands. Each range band not only takes more time to shoot to but also reduces the shooter's Skill accordingly. Short Range is full Skill and 1SR. Medium Range is 3/4 Skill and 2SR. Long Range is 1/2 Skill and 3SR. Extreme Range is 1/4 Skill and 4SR. For example, a master archer (100% Skill) is using an RQ2 Composite Bow (100m Base Range). His Short Range Limit is 25m and 100% Skill. His Medium Range is 26m to 50m and 75% Skill. His Long Range is 51m to 75m and 50% Skill. Finally, his Extreme Range is 76m to 100m and all shots are at 25% Skill. The SR times take into account the time needed to gauge the range, lead the target (if moving), fire the missile weapon, and for the projectile's flight to the target. A normal arrow will travel at around 80m per second, so the SRs are designed to mirror this.
  18. olskool

    Mongoose RuneQuest I

    Yep, and it shows right from the First Chapter too. I bought RQ6 in the first run of hardbacks TDM put out and there was NO HOPE of Legend (which I bought at the same time) competing against it. At least Legend had a good price point, although I'm not fond of the digest-sized book my hobby shop was selling. But then again, I'm a fan of big hard-backed "dead tree" editions. I cannot wait for Chaosium or The Design Mechanism to print their games in a BIG leather and brass bound full-color hardcover like an old Gutenberg Bible (you know, the ones that break your toes if you drop them on your foot). I'm SO buying that!
  19. olskool

    Mongoose RuneQuest I

    As Runeblogger stated, one issue was that you had to find and "attune" Runes in order to cast magic in the game. In addition, different spells REQUIRED different Runes so you could find yourself searching high and low for a specific Rune in order to cast a given spell, or being limited in the spells you could cast based on your collection of Runes. MRQ1 WAS true to the name RuneQuest. You would also gain special abilities from your Runes. I would classify those abilities as something similar to Feats in D&D. They were not well thought out. Nor were the Heroic Abilities that you could buy with Hero Points IF you had a sufficiently high skill in something. Then there was the hassle of Divine Magic/Theism requiring a certain size of temple to regain Divine Magic. The biggest gripe initially was splitting the base rules into TWO BOOKS (ala D&D), RuneQuest and The RuneQuest Companion. Sorcery was in the Companion so you were screwed IF you wanted to be a Sorcerer initially. I liked the CONCEPT of attuning Runes but disliked the IMPLEMENTATION in MRQ1. I changed this concept to requiring the attuning of the Spirit Rune for the Shaman and the Magic Rune for Sorcerers. Runes could be granted by Cults or found as physical Relics/Manifestations just like True Stone or Magic Crystals for those who might NOT like the idea of committing to a Cult. Thus, in my game, Runes were both "spiritual" (mostly granted by Cult Affiliation) AND "physical" (an actual Rune made "solid" that granted connection to that Rune's power without a Cult Affiliation). I changed the rules to allow you to "attune" a number of Crystals, Relics, True Stone Fragments, or Runes (I use a Willpower stat to replace POW and this is what I use for a limit to attunements, but you could also use CHA or POW). Attuning one of these items would cost 1 point of permanent POW (remember that I made POW a "derived characteristic" like HP) and you COULD buy heroic abilities linked to Runes IF you spent permanent POW. Attuning a Rune would grant a POW gain roll. Some players also didn't like the idea that weapons had both Hitpoints AND Armor Points. I thought it was a good idea as it added another distinct trait to weapons. Overall, my impression of MRQ1 was that the product was "rushed" in development and suffered from being "designed by committee" where the committee didn't always agree on the direction the game was heading.
  20. olskool

    Weapon Damages

    I find it shameful that you aren't allowed to hunt there. Most game is far from helpless and I find it rewarding to kill, dress, and EAT an animal as opposed to buying a processed animal at the store. For the record, I'm NOT trying to offend any PETA followers here. I killed predators on my farm (mostly Raccoon or Opossum killing my Chickens) and hunted animals to supplement my supply of meat. The way I grew up if you were eating meat, you probably knew its name when it lived (we raised beef cattle) OR you hunted and killed it. That's just life in rural PA (I'm so rural that I have Amish neighbors). Please don't be offended by my mention of hunting/killing deer (or other animals). I use 400 to 500-grain arrows with a fairly stiff SPLINE (for the uninitiated, SPLINE is how stiff the arrow shaft is). Even using illuminated nocks, I lose a LOT of arrows hunting. Most arrows that hit game will crack or bend, rendering them useless. I wonder if this would be the case with heavier "War arrows" which often weigh 10 grains per pound of Draw Weight (so a 120lb Draw Weight Warbow would use a 1200 grain/78 gram arrow). I use my back muscles to draw my recurve. My Compound Bow is much less finicky. In addition, it has an 80% "Letoff" at full draw. This means it only takes 15lbs of Draw Weight to hold my 80lb Bow at full draw. This is why I use my Compound Bow in tree stands... A much easier seated draw.
  21. olskool

    Weapon Penetration Ratings

    As several of you know, I have modified my weapons and armor extensively from the basic game. My most recent modification is dropping the Damage Bonus in favor of a Surplus STR Rule. I always HATED the RQ Damage Bonus because it was applied to EVERY weapon regardless of its weight. Thus a fighter with a 1d4 damage bonus applied it equally to a shortsword or a troll maul. If this fighter PUNCHED you, he could inflict as much damage as an ordinary man wielding a Broadsword. I found this problematic, so I changed the Damage Bonus Rule. Under the new system I use, I now subtract the weapon's Required STR from the Character's STR and give a bonus of +1 to damage for every 5 points of "Surplus STR" he has left. I also add 1 point to his Surplus STR for every 10 points of SIZ he has over the weapon's Required SIZ. All weapons now have a Required SIZ, STR, and DEX. HTH damage is now a chart based on STR modified by SIZ and the largest man does about 1D4 damage with an ordinary man doing 1D2 damage. This system has worked well for balancing out damages (a larger man might take a Broadsword because he will have more "Surplus STR" than with that Greatsword). There is one more "reality-based" weapon behavior that I have wanted to model and only just recently began to try out... armor penetration. As we all know, the traditional way to deal with this is to increase weapon damage to overcome AP. This tends to generate weapons that "one-shot" unarmored foes and that simply isn't realistic. A Bodkin arrow isn't really more damaging than a broadhead arrow but it will penetrate armor better. So how do we model this in a simple and fast game rule? To do so, I have added Penetration Ratings to my weapons. Penetration Ratings: So what are Penetration Ratings? In a word, they Modify the Armor Value of worn armor WITHOUT increasing or decreasing a weapon's listed Damage. If the target of an attack is wearing armor, you will increase it or decrease it according to the Penetration Rating of the attacking weapon. If the target is NOT wearing armor, the Penetration Rating is ignored. Below are the 5 Penetration Rating along with examples of weapons that possess those ratings. Very Poor Penetrators: These weapons have trouble with even light armor. Very Poor Penetrators ADD 2 to the Armor Points of the target location hit. Examples include Punches, Kicks, and Headbutts from non-martial artists, The Bo Staff, Bolas, *Primitive Light Spears/Javelins, Whips, Single Sticks, Shovels, Clubs, and the Runner's Whipstick. Stones which are thrown or from Shepard's Slings (but not Staff Sling stones or any sling bullets) also fall into this Rating. Poor Penetrators: These weapons have trouble with many armors. They ADD 1 to the target's Armor Points on a given location. Examples include Staff Sling Stones (but not Bullets), Hammers, Light Maces (without flanges), Rocks in HTH (as clubs), *Primitive Heavy Spears/Javelins, Darts (thrown and blown), ^Self-bow Broadheads, Grain Flails, and the Quarter Staff. Normal Penetrators: These weapons are in the majority and provide NO BONUS OR PENALTY TO AP. This list includes most Swords, Axes, Daggers, ^Self-Bow Bodkins, Sling Bullets, Mauls, ^Composite Bow Broadheads, and ^Light Crossbow Broadheads among others. Good Penetrators: These weapons are better than normal at penetrating armor. The target's AP is REDUCED by 1 (minimum of 0) on a given location. Examples include The Rapier, the Rondel Dagger, *Heavy Spears/Javelins, ^Elf Bow Broadheads, ^Composite Bow Bodkins, ^Light Crossbow Bolts, Black Powder Firearms, ^Heavy Crossbow Broadheads, Mining Pickaxes, and Militarized Pitchforks/Tridents. Excellent Penetrators: These weapons are very good at penetrating armor. The target's AP is REDUCED by 2 (minimum of 0) on the location in question. Examples include Military Picks, *Light Spears/Javelins, ^Elf Bow Bodkins, ^Heavy Crossbow Bodkin/Bolts, and Crow's Beak or Lucern Hammer style Polearms. This system has not been tested yet but I'm confident that it will add a bit of depth to the weapons without unbalancing the system too much. It also allows for better armor penetration without creating a "Damage Arms Race." After watching how much the addition of Reach affected my game, without unbalancing it, I'm confident enough in Penetration to post it. So, what are your thoughts on my idea? * My Spears are segregated by Reach Length (2m Javelins, 3m Short Spears, 4m Long Spears) and Weapon Weight. Primitive Light Spears/Javelins (in both Short and Long variants) have fire-hardened wooden tips (1D4 damage). Primitive Heavy Spears (in all lengths) have stone tips (1D6 damage) and thicker hafts. Light Spears/Javelins have smaller metal tips (and do 1D6+1 Damage) and smaller hafts while Heavy Spears/Javelins have thicker longer blades (like daggers but doing 1D8+1) heavier hafts and metal counter-weights on the back of the haft (like the Spartan Spear). The larger blade reduces the Heavy Spear/Javelin's Penetration Rating. ^My bows do damage according to the Bow/Crossbow's Draw Weight. The weapon requires 1 STR per 10lbs of Draw Weight (20lbs for Crossbows). Damage is based on Draw Weight and ranges from 1D2 to 2D8 by individual weapon.
  22. olskool

    Weapon Penetration Ratings

    This is my BIG beef with the Damage Bonus System. A strong character receives the double bonus of being able to use high damage weapons like Great Axes or Troll Mauls AND then they get their FULL Damage Bonus as well. There is just something WRONG with a strong warrior being able to do as much damage with a plastic spork as an ordinary man with a Dagger. This is why I have recently started using a "Surplus STR" system for Damage Bonuses. If you are using a large, heavy weapon like a Great Axe; you will see a "reduced damage bonus" over using a smaller weapon like a Short Sword because you simply cannot swing that Great Axe as fast as that Short Sword. Under my system, EVERY weapon has a SIZ, STR, and DEX requirement that you must meet in order to wield it. This not only reduces the number of larger weapons in the game, it also eliminates issues like the "Halfling with a Great Sword" one often sees in games without these requirements. Once the players accept that you must have a certain SIZ and STR to wield the larger damage weapons, they begin to accept that larger weapons can have smaller damage bonuses due to less extra STR to generate that bonus. The difference in damage bonus being offset by the larger base damage that the weapon generates. The big issue I have with this system is regulating the NUMBER of "SURPLUS STR Points" needed to generate a Damage Bonus. I always err on the side of caution and am using 5 surplus STR points per +1 Damage Bonus. I allow the Character to add 1 to their effective STR for every 10 FULL points of SIZ they possess over the SIZ needed to wield the weapon. I have this Bonus expressed as a "die" in my game. If you would have +2 Damage due to excess STR, I would express it as +1D2 Damage.
  23. olskool

    Weapon Penetration Ratings

    I'm actually using the idea presented by MJ Sadique where armor is multiplied by 1.5 or 2 for poor penetrators or by 0.75 or 0.5 for good penetrators. It adds an additional level of flavor/differentiation between the weapons and hasn't adversely affected game balance. It helps that the most common weapons have no penetration modifier.
  24. olskool

    Weapon Damages

    Wrong guess. I do own a Compound Bow (80lb Draw Weight, 31" Draw Length) but most of my shooting was done with a Hoyt Recurve (50lb Draw Weight, 31" Draw Length) under HUNTING conditions. My longest kill with a Recurve is 58 yards on a white-tailed deer. This is a long shot and I was very lucky. Now let's address some of your issues with my post so I can clarify my position. I will start by the RuneQuest RAW rules involving Bows from the newly reprinted RuneQuest Classic. This will give people reading this post a "benchmark" to use in comparing my rules to the basic rules in RQ2. We will use the Composite Bow as it is the closest example to a modern Recurve Bow (the bow I'm using in these examples). The Composite Bow: Base Range 100 meters, Long Range 150 meters, Extreme Range 200 meters. Shooting Skill is HALVED at Long Range (so a 100% Skill is reduced to 50%) and QUARTERED at Extreme Range (So a 100% Skill is now reduced to 25%). The SR Cost remains the same regardless of the Range at which the Bowman is shooting. There are Skill reductions for environmental factors. Now here are my "stats" for a Composite Bow with a Draw Weight of STR10 (a perfectly average STR) and a medium SIZ to the bow (I have Pixi, Short, Medium, and long Bow Staves which are used in a formula with Draw Weight (10lbs of Draw Weight equal 1 STR required to use the bow) to determine the bow's Base Range. Skipping all of that, my STR10 Composite Bow would also have a Range of 100 meters as a Base Range. I then DIVIDE this Base Range by FOUR to determine my four range bands. So my Compound Bow would have a 25 meter Short Range with a normal Skill roll to hit (so a 100% Skill would be unaffected). At the 50m Medium Range Band, the chance to hit reduces by 25% (so a 100% Skill becomes 75%). Carrying on to Long Range at 75 meters will cut the shooter's Skill in HALF (so a 100% Skill becomes 50%). Reaching the limit of Extreme Range at 100 meters will have reduced the shooter's Skill to ONE QUARTER (or 25% for a Skill of 100%). As you can see, my Range Bands are more "real world oriented" where any shot on a point target over 50 yards is a very long shot and fairly difficult to achieve. "It is also a myth that you can purposefully hit a man-sized target at extreme range." Not True. Just YouTube Long Range Archery and dozens of long ranged shots on game animals with Recurve Bows will come up. Hitting a man is no more difficult than hitting a Bear, Deer, or Hog and there are examples of those shots in plenty. Is it easy? NO! Can it be done? Yes it can. I'll be the first to admit it is hard to do and that is why a MASTER BOWMAN will only have a 25% chance to hit a target at 100 meters under my rules. "It is interesting to see lighting as your skill modifiers but not wind..." As a great many of the Forum users are not English-as-a-first-language speakers, I will explain the meaning of "etc..." This phrase is Latin for "Et Cetera" which translates as "and so forth." It is used to denote an INCOMPLETE LISTING of items. In my modifiers, I listed a few examples for reference so readers could visualize how my modifiers might affect the shot. Yes, I use modifiers for wind. I just didn't include a complete list here. Now I will address your "issues" with the added Strike Ranks and Range Estimation. You make a statement that leads me to believe that YOU think that the time in Strike Ranks is "logged" while holding a "drawn Bow." You also point out the difficulty of Range Estimation and the role it plays in accuracy. I'll start with Range Estimation. This is a function of a shooter's SKILL. Highly skilled shooters are masters of Range Estimation. I factored this in by reducing the Skill for each Range Band. This "models" the increasing difficulty in estimating the target's range and calculating a proper "lead" for a moving target. These mental calculations also take time to do. Thus, Range Estimation has a hand in the time in SRs that a shot takes. As for the assertion you make about holding a Recurve Bow of any weight, I agree TOTALLY. Where the issue comes in is in this assumption. I never said that the shooter would be holding his draw the whole time. I see a missile weapon attack the same way one is supposed to visualize a melee attack. We are explicitly told by RuneQuest that an attack is "a series of blows, feints, and maneuvers" that culminate in a to hit roll. Missile combat should be NO DIFFERENT. I visualize a missile attack being... 1) The shooter orients his weapon towards his target. 2) he then considers the Range (Range Estimation) and any lead he may need to incorporate in order to hit the target. 3) He then steadies, draws, and smoothly releases the projectile. 4) he "follows through" on his release as he observes his projectile's flight. All of those steps take TIME. I measure that time in Strike Ranks (although my SRs are "roughly" 1/2 a second as my rounds are only 6 seconds long). 4 Strike Ranks (potentially representing 4 seconds in the RAW RQ2) is pretty generous for a shot to 100 meters. Just looking at a typical arrow traveling about 80 meters per second will tell you that even a "snapshot" at 100 yards is going to take about 2 seconds between the draw and release and including the arrow's flight time to 100 yards. I hope these explanations "clarify" my previous post for you.
  25. olskool

    Aldryami vs uz

    It won't be the first time I've had to "fix" something that [Insert ANY game designer's name here] wrote. I'm used to it now. I mean, "vegetarian Morokanth??!!" Seriously??
×