Jump to content

Robert

Member
  • Posts

    16
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Converted

  • RPG Biography
    Gamer for the 30 years, publishing as Bat in the Attic Games for 10.
  • Current games
    Majestic Wilderlands
  • Blurb
    The referee that allows players to trash his setting.

Recent Profile Visitors

208 profile views

Robert's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/4)

12

Reputation

  1. Or Worlds of Wonder, various Elric RPGs, Elfquest, Magic World, Nephlim, Ringword, Prince Valiant, 7th Sea, Superworld, and Thieves World. Worlds of WOnder, Magic WOrld and Superworld are particularly problematic as they are designed to be generic in terms of their setting.
  2. I understood exactly what Jeff is saying. What I am saying that mandate acts as disincentive to authors just interested in adventures and settings.
  3. There is no requirement that one has to use of all of the D20 SRD or the open content of Legends. Having the bulk of the rules as open content particularly the “lists” like creatures, items, spells, etc was an aide for those us who focus on adventures and settings. To use the BRP SRD an author has to focus on coming up with those items first and then they can get on with their adventure or setting.
  4. Likewise, I worked with the staff of Fantasy Flight and Daniel Proctor to resolve issues with their community content program license and the content they offer. I am an advocate of open content licenses that are free in both sense of the word particularly for systems, but I understand if a company want to retain tighter control especially if a system it tightly woven with a particular setting IP. The same here, which is why here I am focusing on the issue I feel that is the most critical to the BRP OGL Namely protecting their the setting IP and the mechanics that implement setting details found in many of their RPG. There are other issues with the BRP OGL but this one is the most critical at the moment in my view. What is permitted or not permitted and how can a third party figure this out in a why that satisfies Chaosium's intent and legally binding on both so the BRP open content can be used by the third party without dispute.
  5. Why? When the wording of the license preclude such use. My point about the license strict wording over the use of concepts and characters that appear in Chaosium branded RPGs hasn't been addressed. Instead we have various staffers, like yourself, assure people that it is OK. So why it is OK for me to use a Knight, Martians, a Dragon, a Chimera, a Merchant when it is not OK to use the Questing Beast, Hastur, Broos, etc when the wording of the licenses concerning Prohibited Content doesn't make a distinction between the two lists? Should I consider the statements made by you and other staff legally part of agreeing to the license? If so that would be highly unusual.
  6. My point is if that Chaosium intent that not how the license reads. It prohibits the use of any element from Le Motre d’Arthur in conjunction with BRP open content and thus knocks out many of the pillars of traditional fantasy roleplaying.
  7. A monster is a character. For example Carrion Crawlers, Beholders, and Mind Flayers are unique monsters found in Dungeons & Dragon that are the original work of Gary Gygax or TSR. It clear that Wizards can choose to share them or not. When the D20 SRD came out they were not found in the open content and moreso Wizards explicitly explained that they were among a list considered to be product identity and thus not available for use via the OGL. The BRP OGL has among other things a restriction on one's use of public domain material if it was published in a Chaosium product. Because of Wizards D20 SRD there is precedent for a company to have control over the IP rights when the "character" is a type of monter. As far as I understand limiting one's ability to use the Public Domain is something that can be part of a license (or contract) in exchange for something of value. In this case the BRP rules declared as open content. The OGL 1.0a has also has structurally similar clause whereby by using the open content you give the right to cite compatibility without a separate license. Since the above list is found in a Chaosium product by the wording of Section 1(e) it is considered prohibited content. The same with list of medieval characters and creatures found in various editions of King Arthur Pendragon. None of the above is unique or unusual in the world of licenses and contracts. The issue I am raising in my reply is whether the license convey Chaosium's intent. While I do have an opinion on its inherent fairness and other points, my reply is about whether the license by itself clearly and completely state what Chaosium is sharing and the conditions in which it is being used. Based on the responses of Chaosium staff here and other areas, it doesn't for the reason in this reply and in my previous reply.
  8. From the BRP SRD Page 1 Section 1(e) and From Book V Le Morte D' Arthur BOOK V. CHAPTER I. How twelve aged ambassadors of Rome came to King Arthur to demand truage for Britain. CHAPTER II. How the kings and lords promised to King Arthur aid and help against the Romans. CHAPTER III. How King Arthur held a parliament at York, and how he ordained the realm should be governed in his absence. CHAPTER IV. How King Arthur being shipped and lying in his cabin had a marvellous dream and of the exposition thereof. CHAPTER V. How a man of the country told to him of a marvellous giant, and how he fought and conquered him. CHAPTER VI. How King Arthur sent Sir Gawaine and other to Lucius, and how they were assailed and escaped with worship. CHAPTER VII. How Lucius sent certain spies in a bushment for to have taken his knights being prisoners, and how they were letted. CHAPTER VIII. How a senator told to Lucius of their discomfiture, and also of the great battle between Arthur and Lucius. CHAPTER IX How Arthur, after he had achieved the battle against the Romans, entered into Almaine, and so into Italy. CHAPTER X. Of a battle done by Sir Gawaine against a Saracen, which after was yielden and became Christian. CHAPTER XI. How the Saracens came out of a wood for to rescue their beasts, and of a great battle. CHAPTER XII. How Sir Gawaine returned to King Arthur with his prisoners, and how the King won a city, and how he was crowned Emperor. From the BRP SRD Page 1 Section 1(e) and From the 1982 Worlds of Wonder Boxed, Magic World, Section IV Creatures Great and Small Chimaera, Demons, Dragons, Dwarves, Elves, Ghosts, Goblins, Horses, Manticores, etc, ============================================================================================================================= Chaosium's intent as expressed by your reply is not clearly stated in the license. The license is specifically designed to preclude the use of public domain material in a way that prevent the release of a retro-clone using the open content of BRP. However as a result of that it also precludes the use of the same elements in any supplemental material based on the BRP SRD. A fallout of the fact that so much of fantasy tabletop roleplaying is based on the fantasy elements introduced first in Dungeons & Dragon which Chaosium took partial advantage of in Runequest and full advantage of in Magic World. Along with that many important fantasy elements of Dungeons & Dragons were taken from the Le' Morte d'Arthur. In addition from my copy of King Arthur Pendragon 5th edition (and earlier editions) Appendix Two: Characters and Creatures covers a wide range of character types and creature commonly used in fantasy medieval settings whether they are based on the myths of King Arthur or not. The problem don't stop there. Call of Cthulu and many related products from Chaosium also covers many elements used in tabletop RPG settings targeting the modern era. Again a strict reading and a focus on excluding public domain material means those elements are not available for use in a supplement based on the BRP SRD. For works shared under the Open Game License 1.0a or a Creative Common License it is far more clears about what is allowed and not allowed. The open content can be used under the terms of the license, and the rest is treated under traditional copyright law including the use of the public domain. While you can clarify things here, when it comes to a dispute the license text is the authority not what is posted in a internet forum or on a website. This reply and other replies only adds to the confusion of what allowed or not allowed by the license. I or any other author should not have to come here to find out what is or is not covered. The BRP OGL is requiring more restriction for the use of the BRP SRD, and these restrictions are vaguely written.
  9. That accurate if that was the case however Mongoose never licensed a set of Runequest or Basic Roleplaying rules from Greg Stafford while he was publishing as Issaries. They wrote their own from scratch.
  10. Sorry about that, I fixed it up. My point is that the rules are Mongoose's own original creations. The two system reference documents, and the Legends RPG are the rules scrubbed of anything that Mongoose licensed from Issaries. And while I didn't say this clearly Issaries did not license the rules to Mongoose. Again I apologize for the confusion.
  11. I addressed this point, in case it wasn't clear. Mongoose didn't license the rules from Issaries. The rules are Mongoose own original creation. Which is why they could release them as Legends. The same with Runequest 6th edition rebranded as Mythras. They are certainly related as they share many mechanics but Legends, Mythras, and Basic Roleplaying are not the same RPG and only one of them was created by Chaosium. And none of them were owned by Greg Stafford while he was publishing as Issaries. And to be I am aware that Glorantha, Call of Cthulu were never open content. Just I am aware that Greyhawk, Forgotten Realms where never released as open content by Wizards in any of their SRDs. I am also a Judges Guild licensee using their Wilderlands material in conjunction with the Swords & Wizardry rules. The material I create and anything derived from them are covered by the license the rules however are not as they are either adapted from Swords & Wizardry or my own original creation.
  12. The Open Game License doesn't expire on content that has been released under its terms. Per section 4 In addition the text Legend and all Legend of ... books have been declared as open content by Mongoose. The book sans art is the SRD for legends. What people forget is that Mongoose did not have a license to the BRP system only the right to use the trademark Runequesr and the Glorantha IP. So they had to create an original but related RPG. Just as many companies back in the 70s and 80s created RPGs that had elements of D&D in their rules. Whether it was the 3d6 attributes like Runequest or class and level like Palladium Fantasy. The OGL also forbids the use of trademarks or citing compatibility with trademark in Section 7 In addition Mongoose withdrew the compatibility license for their past SRD. The only one still active is the one for Legends. This is the source of the confusion over what Mongoose terminated. Because of this section, because of much of an appeal of an RPG is the setting which is not open content many of the projects I see here in this thread can't done with the open content of Legends. Not because the license on the open content expired or that Mongoose lost the right to use the Runequest trademark or the use of the Glorantha IP. Chaosium knows this which why they haven't issued DMCA take downs to the various sites with material based the Legends open content or open content based the old Mongoose SRDs like Openquest. Nobody has to take my word for it just buy a copy of Legend and read everything for yourself. All the licensing is at the end of the book. But also mean that the moderator and Chaosium is correct in that you can't just write something for one of their RapGs or settings. While Cthulhu is public domain the trademarks are still in force. Hamstringing any projects without the advice of attorney. But for original ideas and setting the material that Mongoose released is still there and available for use.
×
×
  • Create New...