Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Sir_Godspeed last won the day on June 20

Sir_Godspeed had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

600 Excellent

About Sir_Godspeed

  • Rank
    Sycophantic Contrarian


  • RPG Biography
    Some DnD, mostly video games otherwise.
  • Current games
    None atm.
  • Location
  • Blurb
    Very much a beginner. Mostly interested in the story- and lore aspect over crunch.

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I am now imagining the Twilight story, but with ogres.
  2. I've got a similar impression. It's present in both worlds and that's just how it works. EDIT: Changed "10 km away" to "10 km up in the air", had a brain fart there.
  3. I've had arguments with Flat-Earthers about this sort of thing, and Akhorahil is, to the best of my knowledge, right. If you're a 1000 km. away from something, even a small hill will be able to cover the line of sight to something that's 10km high in the air. I would argue that both the Red Moon and Kero Fin are magical locuses, and therefore either pluripresent, or deviate from simple Eucledian geometry. It's sort of like in a video game where the objective marker is always visible even if you can't see the objective yet. And Kero Fin is of course in the Sky World because they Sky isn't even a part of the Inner World.
  4. Holy crap. That Sevening must be pretty reliable.
  5. How many thousands are we talking about here?
  6. If possible, making the text vector-based would help with avoiding graphical artifacting for a potential poster - but I know dick all about graphical design, so I wouldn't know how to do that, or even if I'm correct. Anyway, that dude looks pretty good for a "pittance" conscript. What the background on them?
  7. I wouldn't know about how the rules are set up, but I guess that makes sense. Wouldn't it be possible to do some clever combining and syncretism, though?
  8. Trolls have a good deal or mixed theism and shamanism, don't they? I guess Arkat Kingtroll would be the most plausible angle of approach.
  9. Child tattoos might not be added until a child has survived a few years. I know of a number of cases were infants are not seen as having souls or a mind of their own until they reach a certain age, for example. It can be seen as psychological coping mechanism for infant mortality rates (I won't comment on whether it's effective or not). This absence of a soul/spirit (local emic terms apply) is also something that makes them extra vulnerable to spirit assaults, and hence is partially explaining the infant mortality rate to begin with). This is also why in some cultures a naming day (or one of several) is not shortly after birth, but at the time of the first teething, or after weaning, or other similar threshold. Fathers tattooing to mark their children reminded me of the (sometimes) Arab practice of taking on names after the (firstborn) child (kunya). "Umm Ali" (Ali's Mother), "Abu Mazen" (Mazen's Father). It's not that I expect Orlanthi to practice this, but the tattooing functions similarly. There are probably parallels in polynesian cultures (given the prevalence of genealogical significance in tatau), but I don't know any specific examples. Apropos of nothing, do bloodlines have their own tattoos, or only clans, btw?
  10. Well, there's always the point about how rivers used to run up. It's one of those things that are good to mention to newbies so that they can prepare for the more seriously weird stuff. My favorite, however, which has less to do with how weird it is, and more to do with being a part of the discussion thread where someone finally put it in clear words, is this: in Glorantha, horses are taxonomically birds.* (*Sort of, being descendants of mutilated Hippogriff which was a beaked, feathered, winged sky-animal. Not a bird in the strictest sense, but close enough for me to find it to be a bit of a mindblowing revelation, and pretty funny).
  11. No True Scotsman at work again. "I HAVE meditated upon the Ultimate, and I've decided I'm gonna punch the moon!" "No, that's not, like, REAL enlightenment!"
  12. @EricW Your summary, and quote, seems a lot more in line with how I imagine illumination in Glorantha to be myself. Yes, obviously motivation is going to be subjective, but even so, I've noticed that whenever Chaos cultists or monsters are brought up together with Storm Bull PCs, there very often seems to be mentions that one or more of the Chaos folks could be Illuminated. This, at least to me, seems like a very gamey approach to the concept, with it being almost being treated just as a monster buff, as opposed to thinking about how that illumination would come about (it's not exactly a reliable process at the best of times - Sevening seems the most semi-reliable, and even that requires exceptional individuals), nor what it would do to a Chaos entity (would they even feel any attachment to their previous motivations and urges? Possibly, possibly not. Illumination changes you in ways that are impossible to predict.)
  13. In the RW, most practicioners of transcendent practices that seek spiritual enlightenment would probably argue that going into such practices with such selfish goals would preclude them from actually ever achieving enlightenment. Obviously, Glorantha is a game world, and functions by its own internal logic - but how does motives and other such elements affect the chances of Illumination (or, I guess, the TYPE of Illumination one ends up with). This applies not just to Ogres, of course, but all sorts of Chaos entities that might want to remain hidden from Storm Bulls or other anti-Chaos measures. This is all with the caveat that such argument of selfishness (or malevolence, etc) precluding Illumination isn't just one practicioner's "no true Scotsman" argument against fellow practicioners they disagree with.
  • Create New...