Rodney Dangerduck Posted September 20 Share Posted September 20 p 120, Meld Form, the first sentence, "This ritual must be undergone whenever a cultist sacrifices for the spell of Proteus" makes little sense in RQG because characters no longer sacrifice multiple times to gain multiple uses of a rune spell. The sentence is confusing and should be deleted or undergo major corrections. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joerg Posted September 22 Share Posted September 22 (edited) Heler Cult: (p. 99) Quote Celestial Body: Lorion This special body is a bright constellation of nine stars that is visible year-round, with New Year Day marked when the sun rises to perfectly align with it. In mid-summer, it sits low in the southern sky, partially obscured by the horizon; in fall, it marks the western Dusk Gates; and in midwinter, it sits high in the north, above the Ice Palace. Lorion is usually considered to be a Water God and lord of the celestial river. "sits low" and "sits high" doesn't quite work out with the mechanics of the sky dome tilt and rotation. In mid-summer, at midnight Lorion sits fairly high in the southern sky as the tilt of the Sun Path and thereby Polaris is either vertical or slightly to the north. In mid-winter at noon, unless you are a Yuthuppan Star Seer you don't get to see Lorion quite high in the northern sky because his light is outdone by that of Yelm, although you get to see the blue color that he carried into the sky. The tilt of the Sunpath and Polaris is considerably to the south, spilling the celestial fire into the Nargan and beyond, making the Sky Dome experience colder everywhere. As a result, objects on the low edge of the sky when they pass the two gates of Dawn and Dusk are elevated quite a bit on their daily pass through the northern sky. Unless of course I got the tilt of the sky diametrically wrong: both the wikia and this thread agree with my conclusions above, but further down in the thread Nick got second thoughts. Although looking at the second image Nick sent to my reply, the considerations above still seem to agree with my observations, and the text inherited from before anybody checked the mechanics (as presented in Elder Secrets) doesn't seem to have taken these mechanics into account. Edited September 22 by Joerg Quote Telling how it is excessive verbis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard S. Posted September 22 Share Posted September 22 Probably not a major issue, but the description under each god's portrait has an invisible blurb about Magasta behind it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Posted October 3 Share Posted October 3 p.111, Nature Of The Cult, 1st para, 2nd sentence, "dwarves" -> "dwarfs". 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hemulaformis Posted November 10 Share Posted November 10 Page 98 of the PDF: "The spell raises the water level on a 20-meter stretch of a river by one meter, requiring about a minute to take effect. Each additional point stacked with the spell (up to 4) doubles the area affected or eases the water level by a half-meter." I believe "eases" should read "raises". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Posted November 27 Share Posted November 27 p.15, Kero Fin and Orlanth both have a “4” label which seems redundant. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jens Posted November 27 Share Posted November 27 (edited) 6 hours ago, Steve said: p.15, Kero Fin and Orlanth both have a “4” label which seems redundant. It’s not redundant, the 4 on Orlanth indicates that 4. Orlanth is the offspring of Umath and 4. Kero Fin (unlike 1. Kolat from 1. MoS or 2. Storm Bull from 2. Mikyh). Where it gets extra confusing is that 1 and 2 are then reused for Ernalda and Fralar/Himile- should likely be A/B or I/II for the additional instances. Might also be clearer if the parent number came after the name and the child number in front. Edited November 27 by Jens 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Posted November 28 Share Posted November 28 (edited) 10 hours ago, Jens said: It’s not redundant, the 4 on Orlanth indicates that 4. Orlanth is the offspring of Umath and 4. Kero Fin But there's a vertical line clearly showing that Orlanth is the son of Umath and Kero Fin. What information is the "4" adding? The other numbers are needed because the spouses aren't individually shown so do not have individual vertical lines from unique parents. It's redundant for Orlanth. Edited November 28 by Steve Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhilHibbs Posted November 28 Share Posted November 28 I was just going to ask what the numbers meant but I think I've figured it out. Where a partnership line has multiple numbered partners, the offspring are numbered the same. So Storm Bull (2) is child of Mikyh (2), but Vadrus, Humakt, Ragnaglar are from others (3). Orlanth is numbered 4 because Umath has multiple partners, even though the positioning of the lines implies that already. I guess if he wasn't numbered then you could infer that by proximity, but the line layout may have changed over time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jajagappa Posted November 28 Share Posted November 28 15 hours ago, Steve said: But there's a vertical line clearly showing that Orlanth is the son of Umath and Kero Fin. What information is the "4" adding? That she is a 4th spouse of Umath. Yes, the line goes direct, but because of placement on the page, it's a useful reminder when you reach Orlanth that he does connect back to that level of parentage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shiningbrow Posted Monday at 01:14 PM Share Posted Monday at 01:14 PM p31. Last paragraph "and which he kept for himself and his personal favorites." - I suspect this should instead read "kept for himself as his personal favorites." (especially given the preceding paragraph's last line - " instead retained as the god’s personal favorite." (otherwise, who are these 'personal favorites'??) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.