David Scott Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 This is a place where you can post any errors you spot in the Week 13 Guide to Glorantha Group Read of the Lunar Empire. Please note that there will be a different thread each week to post errors. This weeks page range is page 292 up to and including page 328. Please include the text to be corrected and the correction. @Rick Meints has clarified versions of the Guide, please check your errors against the latest PDF: Quote The most up to date version of the PDFs is on Chaosium.com Anyone who has purchased the PDFs can get the latest copy there, although you will have to have an account set up on Chaosium.com, and you may also have to have Dustin add the PDFs to your list of previous purchases. We have records for who purchased the PDFs on Glorantha.com, but we did not automatically add them onto chaosium.com Quote ----- Search the Glorantha Resource Site: https://wellofdaliath.chaosium.com. Search the Glorantha mailing list archives: https://glorantha.steff.in/digests/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 p.293 - as with several other maps, the resolution is too low to be able to zoom in to read smaller names on the PDF. The river names are completely unreadable and the place names are heavily pixellated when zooming in. Due to the density of placenames there doesn't seem to be an option to simply re-do the map with larger placenames, so either we need a higher-res map, or to lose some of the placenames and use larger labels. p. 297 - as above, but even more illegible, with the city/town names totally unreasable on the PDF. But given the purpose of this map, I suggest that most of the place names could be removed entirely, and just have region names with larger text to make them readable. p. 302 - as p.297. Again, remove some/all placenames and just have region names. p. 304 - 2nd column, 1st para, 4th sentence, is "Tripolis" singular or plural? "Although the Tripolis were liberated ... it never regained its independence". I presume the latter "it" and "its" are still referring to Tripolis. So this needs correcting to either use "were", "they" and "their", or "was", "it" and "its". p.306 - italics text, 3rd para, "priestesses" should be "priestess". p. 307 - 1st column, 2nd para, last sentence, "Pelorian" should be "Peloria". p. 321 - Jillaro, 2nd para, 1st sentence, "Jillaro-of-the-Prince's Green" uses one em dash and then hyphens. Should be all hyphens (or all em dashes). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yelm's Light Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 Tripolis should be singular, if it follows the Greek. (It's a single unit comprised of three cities/polities.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Posted September 19, 2017 Share Posted September 19, 2017 p.321 - Old Sylila, the last sentence uses "satrap" and "Satrap" - should be consistent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 p.297 map - although the key lists the size in miles of the different coloured/sized circles, we seem to be missing amy explanation as to what these actually signify. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metcalph Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 48 minutes ago, Steve said: p.297 map - although the key lists the size in miles of the different coloured/sized circles, we seem to be missing amy explanation as to what these actually signify. The explanation is given in the sidebar on p296. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 9 minutes ago, metcalph said: The explanation is given in the sidebar on p296. Doh! How did I miss that. Although it's more obvious in the hard copy when the sidebar is opposite the map. But the definition of the grey circles is still missing, isn't it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metcalph Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 13 minutes ago, Steve said: Doh! How did I miss that. Although it's more obvious in the hard copy when the sidebar is opposite the map. But the definition of the grey circles is still missing, isn't it? A draft version of that map had dwarf zones labelled as blocking zones. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jajagappa Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 13 hours ago, metcalph said: dwarf zones labelled as blocking zones. I seem to remember some reference to them as Mostali magical suppression zones. As you note it may have been in a draft version. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.