Jump to content
MOB

Tribal Edit Thread for 13th Age Glorantha Rule Book

Recommended Posts

Please post any errors/typos spotted in the 13th Age Glorantha Rulebook to this thread. Please take care to note the page number where you've noticed something.

We'll keep this tribal edit open until March 6th. We'll then review the thread and make any necessary changes to the files before sending to print.

Please note there is a separate thread for the Glorantha Sourcebook here.

Many thanks!

Edited by MOB
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The text has graphics behind  it.

I’m aware this is supposed to look cool. But the book is meant to be read. There’s plenty of attractive design without a dirty beige background making things hard to read.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

p. 24, the boxed text. The first bullet item, Zoran Zoran should be Zorak Zoran. 

Also, the formatting inside the box is weird (look at the last three rows.) I have seen the same weird formatting in other boxes, and in columns of text throughout the book. I'd suggest looking at all of them again.

Edited by rabindranath72

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The troll warrior write up is inconsistent about the spelling Karrg ( in the intro paragraph) vs Kaarg (eg Kaarg knows me epic talent). Not that trolls are renowned for their spelling, but Karrg is correct. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On page 3, amongst the KS backers, there is a gentleman referenced to as Ignacio RodrÃguez Chaves. I suspect his real name is Ignacio Rodríguez Chaves. Same remark with Jérome Bianquis and Jérome Bianquis. Likewise, on page 4, there is a gentleman referenced to as Pablo DomÃnguez Castro. I suspect his real name is Pablo Domínguez Castro.

 

These typos smell of copy and paste from two sources using different character encoding sets.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

p96, Classes

At the bottom of the table:

***The troll adept, like the druid it is based on, is likely to vary these stats based it talents.

This sentence doesn't mean anything, does it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 15/02/2018 at 10:38 AM, metcalph said:

p440 - Under Monk Header "Kraloreli culture" should be "Kralori culture"

Also under 'Monk' the sentence "In a couple cases, like the Sun Shield Monk..." should read "In a couple of cases, like the Square Round Monk..."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Worshipers spelt with one p throughout rather than the usual worshippers. 

P.31 the Twenty Runes

"Thanks to your unique and backgrounds". 

Missing a thing! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Page 99, the Berserker Talent Clanging Shield: do you automatically get the die power Shield Chewer, or do you need to choose it as one of your powers?

Edited by BeronTheGrey

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Page 100, the Berserker Talent One Breath: in the epic feat description, the infinity rune in the sentence "There are epic powers that get you rolling" is misplaced.

Edited by BeronTheGrey

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Page 105, 4th paragraph under heading The Storm Bull Berserker Die: reference to Wild Frenzy Talent in sentence "Normally we don’t have to spell that out, but
there would be some enticing exploitations of talents like Wild Frenzy if we didn’t clear this up from the start."

This should probably be Blood Frenzy talent.

Edited by BeronTheGrey

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Page 110, Roaring Return special power: the Champion Feat text reads "The recovery is now a free."

This should probably read either "The recovery is now free." or "The recovery is now a free recovery."

Edited by BeronTheGrey

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Page 124, Keeper of Spirits Talent: in the text "In addition, minor earth spirits you summon with using summon minor guardian don’t cost you any hit points.", the bolded word "with" seems to be redundant.

Edited by BeronTheGrey

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...