Silentium Posted July 30, 2018 Share Posted July 30, 2018 On 7/28/2018 at 9:31 PM, JonL said: You can find a fan made one linked in the HQ links thread at the top of this sub-forum. >Thank you!. I found it. It looks promising. I'll give it a shot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard S. Posted July 30, 2018 Share Posted July 30, 2018 Well, July's at its end now... Any more news? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Cooper Posted August 7, 2018 Author Share Posted August 7, 2018 On 7/30/2018 at 4:28 PM, Richard S. said: Well, July's at its end now... Any more news? I've just got back from Zim. I need to collate feedback, put out another version to reviewers etc. Progress but not there yet. 2 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BruceMri Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 *perches like Nipper, cocks head* It's a good thing the world keeps me supplied in shinies while I wait, but just curious: any news of note? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Cooper Posted September 1, 2018 Author Share Posted September 1, 2018 15 minutes ago, BruceMri said: *perches like Nipper, cocks head* It's a good thing the world keeps me supplied in shinies while I wait, but just curious: any news of note? We are working through the draft. We want to get a first version that everyone finds the clearest presentation of the system yet. Hopefully you will bear with us a little while longer while we do that. Work is continuing on Ron Edward's Cosmic Zap. He has playtest videos and notes over at his Actual Play site. You can check it out there. We have learned a lot from that and we are ready to start turning those ideas into something more concrete. We are negotiating about a couple more genre packs, and also starting to think about a new core book with some sample genre packs in it. Obviously we need to get the presentation of the rules cleared up first. Progress is ongoing. We want to get it right though. 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BruceMri Posted September 2, 2018 Share Posted September 2, 2018 Very happy to hear about the progress! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nevermet Posted January 29, 2019 Share Posted January 29, 2019 On 9/1/2018 at 6:30 AM, Ian Cooper said: Work is continuing on Ron Edward's Cosmic Zap. He has playtest videos and notes over at his Actual Play site. You can check it out there. We have learned a lot from that and we are ready to start turning those ideas into something more concrete. We are negotiating about a couple more genre packs, and also starting to think about a new core book with some sample genre packs in it. Obviously we need to get the presentation of the rules cleared up first. I'm extremely interested in both of these. I hope to hear more. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aprewett Posted February 8, 2019 Share Posted February 8, 2019 Ian, any chance you can let slip the experience system in the new document? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soltakss Posted February 8, 2019 Share Posted February 8, 2019 8 hours ago, Aprewett said: Ian, any chance you can let slip the experience system in the new document? Or even publish the SRD? 1 2 Quote Simon Phipp - Caldmore Chameleon - Wallowing in my elitism since 1982. Many Systems, One Family. Just a fanboy. www.soltakss.com/index.html Jonstown Compendium author. Find my contributions here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vonpaulus Posted February 22, 2019 Share Posted February 22, 2019 we are waiting for the SRD. when it will be released? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aprewett Posted February 24, 2019 Share Posted February 24, 2019 Just an FYI and may have been covered already. @Ian Cooper pg 74 HQG, part 3, confused my from my first read until today, so a long time... That section mentions 2 lasting consequences determined etc. I then tried to make sense of the bits that followed like parting shot, and thought I was so dumb that I could not match up the part 3 with parting shots and asymmetrical exchanges. And now I know it was the publisher doing a poor job of cut and paste, thanks to HQ2. Please fix this and either marry the text up or put a page reference to page 82! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christoph Kohring Posted February 24, 2019 Share Posted February 24, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, Aprewett said: @Ian Cooper Please fix this and either marry the text up or put a page reference to page 82! Your post more properly belongs in the errata thread: Edited February 24, 2019 by Christoph Kohring Addded link Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Cooper Posted February 24, 2019 Author Share Posted February 24, 2019 On 2/22/2019 at 1:29 PM, vonpaulus said: we are waiting for the SRD. when it will be released? We are in layout, once we are happy with the way that final document looks, we will publish the SRD. 10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aprewett Posted February 25, 2019 Share Posted February 25, 2019 I thought about that but figured this SRD thinky is effectively HQ3.5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christoph Kohring Posted February 25, 2019 Share Posted February 25, 2019 (edited) 6 hours ago, Aprewett said: I thought about that but figured this SRD thinky is effectively HQ3.5 HW: RiG (2000): HQ0 (HW1) HQ:RiG (2003): HQ1 (HW1.1) HQ:CR (2009): HQ2 (HW2) HQ:G (2015): HQ2.1 (HW2.1) HQ SRD & OGL (2020...): HQ2.2 (HW2.2) HW:RiG is to HQ:RiG what Ludwig von Mises (1881-1973)' Nationalökonomie: Theorie des Handelns & Wirtschaftens (1940) is to Human Action: A Treatise on Economics (1949): its edition zero! 😉 Edited February 25, 2019 by Christoph Kohring Added the last -cultural- line... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilverSeraph Posted February 26, 2019 Share Posted February 26, 2019 9 hours ago, Christoph Kohring said: HW: RiG (2000): HQ0 (HW1) HQ:RiG (2003): HQ1 (HW1.1) HQ:CR (2009): HQ2 (HW2) HQ:G (2015): HQ2.1 (HW2.1) HQ SRD & OGL (2020...): HQ2.2 (HW2.2) HW:RiG is to HQ:RiG what Ludwig von Mises (1881-1973)' Nationalökonomie: Theorie des Handelns & Wirtschaftens (1940) is to Human Action: A Treatise on Economics (1949): its edition zero! 😉 A man after my own heart. Don't see much Mises or Austrian Economics mentioned anywhere on the net. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christoph Kohring Posted February 26, 2019 Share Posted February 26, 2019 On 2/22/2019 at 2:29 PM, vonpaulus said: We are waiting for the SRD. When it will be released? Me -silly me- I am waiting for the errata! When will it be released?!? I have been waiting since 2009... I have trouble understanding how an HQ SRD can be published before any corrected version of the last version of the rules. It just seems ass-backwards to me. How can one take seriously a publisher who doesn't believe in his product enough to ever put out an errata? Now -who knows? we might very well get an errata of the SRD once it is out before getting one for the core rules?!! 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aprewett Posted February 26, 2019 Share Posted February 26, 2019 My HQG journey only started 18 months ago. That was also my introduction to Glorantha. Not really understanding the setting from HQG, especially the magic and creatures - powers of both. I thought I would have to delve into Runequest and along came the latest version. So I dived in and then started seeing masses of errata clarifications all over the place, so a few voices started calling for a official thread in one place and that was like pulling teeth. I don't understand a publisher who knows there is going to be errata, not starting an official thread day 2 after release, instead we all had to jump up and down begging. I gave up at this stage and realised I had pulled a clanger by buying into version 1 of the book and was never going to wrap my head (and time) around all the errata, let alone the rules. So in that time I must have spend close to $1000 buying current and old titles, I was loving what I was reading but the company that produces it... not so much. I have since given up on Runequest, the only thing I was half looking for was the discount code for the printed screen - I don't think its been sent, probably would not get it anyway unless I had spare cash. So I am generally a thumbs down with this publisher, not the fans though, deffinately the counter balance to my negative feelings. Just my journey for those that might be interested in a newby's exposure to this place. They have my money, more fool me, diving in and not treading water for a bit to see if the temperture was ok. And yes I saw early on all the calls for an errata to HQ, but did not read the signs very well. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soltakss Posted March 1, 2019 Share Posted March 1, 2019 On 2/25/2019 at 4:03 PM, Christoph Kohring said: HW: RiG (2000): HQ0 (HW1) HQ:RiG (2003): HQ1 (HW1.1) Mythic Russia (HW1.2) HQ:CR (2009): HQ2 (HW2) HQ:G (2015): HQ2.1 (HW2.1) HQ SRD & OGL (2020...): HQ2.2 (HW2.2) You forgot Mythic Russia. 1 Quote Simon Phipp - Caldmore Chameleon - Wallowing in my elitism since 1982. Many Systems, One Family. Just a fanboy. www.soltakss.com/index.html Jonstown Compendium author. Find my contributions here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tinkgineer Posted April 19, 2019 Share Posted April 19, 2019 Is this coming this year? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soltakss Posted April 20, 2019 Share Posted April 20, 2019 13 hours ago, Tinkgineer said: Is this coming this year? We can only hope. It just be the prettiest and best-laid out of SRDs. Personally, I like my SRDs as plain old documents that I can copy text from, not beautifully presented supplements that are difficult to use as sources. 3 Quote Simon Phipp - Caldmore Chameleon - Wallowing in my elitism since 1982. Many Systems, One Family. Just a fanboy. www.soltakss.com/index.html Jonstown Compendium author. Find my contributions here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BruceMri Posted April 26, 2019 Share Posted April 26, 2019 On 4/20/2019 at 3:28 AM, soltakss said: Personally, I like my SRDs as plain old documents that I can copy text from, not beautifully presented supplements that are difficult to use as sources. Me too. The Fate SRD website has the highest level of formatting I'd care for. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Cooper Posted April 28, 2019 Author Share Posted April 28, 2019 On 4/19/2019 at 9:38 PM, Tinkgineer said: Is this coming this year? Sure, we have had a couple of hold ups on the layout. It's coming. Soon. 4 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Job Posted May 14, 2019 Share Posted May 14, 2019 On 4/28/2019 at 9:34 PM, Ian Cooper said: Sure, we have had a couple of hold ups on the layout. It's coming. Soon. Would it be SRD web site, PDF, or both? Quote Sanpat Suvarnadat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aprewett Posted May 28, 2019 Share Posted May 28, 2019 I hope there is some examples of Flaws. I dont think I am doing them right. I got the impression that they are the Resistance or Difficulty rating against witch the player is rolling a suitable ability. Is that correct? Or They are an abiluty like any other and the gm still sets a difficulty level to roll against? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.