Jump to content

Cthulhu Rising as official Chaosium settings for BRP?


Trifletraxor

Recommended Posts

Maybe what we need is a consensus about what a 'strong' setting is?

For me a strong setting is one that is detailed, well thought out, internally consistent, and that offers opportunities for adventure of both the legal and illegal kind.

It has to have scope too. Being confined to just one system in a SF game isn't my bag of tea although the Jovian Chronicles made a good stab at it.

If it is a Hard SF game then I want the stars to be right and for the technology to be at least plausible.

Thoughts?

__________________

Joseph Paul

"Nothing partys like a rental" explains the enduring popularity of prostitution.:eek:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think a 'strong' setting requires loads and loads of detail... more importantly it needs a distinct and obvious 'flavor' that pervades it... lots of obvious adventure hooks and things that grab the imagination.

I've read one page descriptions that did more for me than books with hundreds of pages...

Then again, what tickles one person's fancy might bore the tears out of another.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think a bigger problem is that I haven't observed people have a lot of agreement on what translates as "hard" SF in the past.

yep... never gonna happen... one man's hyperspace/AI/wormhole/anti-grav is another man's pixie dust/magic wand/unicorn/bag-o-holding... that's why some people say 'firm' vs. 'hard'... though there's probably not much agreement there either. Maybe just call it all 'space opera' and just get on with it...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I looked at the Cthulu Rising site this morning and I have to say I am impressed, I liked it and I usually don't go for sci-fi. Maybe it should be Chaosium's go-to sci-fi setting...you could delete the Mythos and still have a very good background. The rules for missiles looked very good, and the star systems looked like a good mix for a 'diaspora' era setting. All positives, from what I could see. Would I buy it? I am honestly not sure about that, but I would be more likely to than Traveller or any of the other popular sci-fi rpgs. If it makes me consider it I'd say it might be a fairly good draw for hard core sci-fi fans. Without the Mythos, they would need a good alien bestiary/creation system, of course. Now I am thinking about statting out the Aliens and the Predators.:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yep... never gonna happen... one man's hyperspace/AI/wormhole/anti-grav is another man's pixie dust/magic wand/unicorn/bag-o-holding... that's why some people say 'firm' vs. 'hard'... though there's probably not much agreement there either. Maybe just call it all 'space opera' and just get on with it...

I suspect, however, that would be inadequate to satisfy Joseph.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some people like 'hard' sf for the flavor it brings... it tends to be gritty and kind of dark (from what I've seen).

Others like it because they can 'believe' it...

Where does the 'science' end and the 'fiction' start?

I think the people who need it to be believable are a source of misery for themselves... it's the same tail chasing that seems to go on with weapon stats... believability vs. playability vs. believability... everyone is going to draw the line someplace different.

Something like Stephenson's 'Diamond Age' setting would suit me fine... not because I thought it was particularly believable/unbelievable but because it had some cool adventure hooks and was strange/alien/exotic enough to spark my imagination.

I say START with what's fun, and work backward from there...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suspect, however, that would be inadequate to satisfy Joseph.

But you don't have to satisfy me- you only have to satisfy enough people to keep Chaosium -and BRP- a going concern. :D

So Simlasa is detail always a bad thing? When does detail detract from the flavor? When is it stifling? If we have a fascist setting is it enough to say that it is a fascist setting? Is it to much to give details on how that society and government works? What should get detailed and what get glossed over and why?

As for fun what do you, personally, think the fun stuff is?

__________________

Joseph Paul

"Nothing partys like a rental" explains the enduring popularity of prostitution.:eek:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know what Cthulu Rising reminded me of? Strange, but some of Andre Norton's stuff. Like the stories about scouting out new worlds. At any rate, something about it just looks right, and fun, as you say. Even with the Cthulu element.

Exploration could be very fun.

__________________

Joseph Paul

"Nothing partys like a rental" explains the enduring popularity of prostitution.:eek:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But you don't have to satisfy me- you only have to satisfy enough people to keep Chaosium -and BRP- a going concern. :D

So Simlasa is detail always a bad thing? When does detail detract from the flavor? When is it stifling? If we have a fascist setting is it enough to say that it is a fascist setting? Is it to much to give details on how that society and government works? What should get detailed and what get glossed over and why?

As for fun what do you, personally, think the fun stuff is?

Never said detail is bad, I like detail... it just isn't, inherently, fun... it might be fun... might not...

If you want to write up a complete and lengthy treatise on the languages of your fantasy setting that's fine, but I don't think it belongs in an introduction to the setting...

A basic guide to the governments, yes, especially if the characters will be involved in politics to any degree.

I think the setting needs to be presented in a big picture kind of way, that hits the high points... and stresses the kind of adventures the setting was designed to encourage...

My idea of the fun parts are the different cultures that might be present... and bit's of folklore/customs that reflect how the people think... detailing the really novel aspects of the setting that people might not grok right away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So Simlasa is detail always a bad thing? When does detail detract from the flavor? When is it stifling? If we have a fascist setting is it enough to say that it is a fascist setting? Is it to much to give details on how that society and government works? What should get detailed and what get glossed over and why?

As for fun what do you, personally, think the fun stuff is?

I differentiate between detail in the rules and a detailed setting. While I dont like the first, the second I welcome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...