tooley1chris

A little Walking Dead meme I made when I was bored. Some of you will smile.

Remember wanting to do a conversion of Rolemaster critical charts to MW, instead of just using double damage for Special/Critical results. Maybe I'll work on that. I could even use NBOS to make a generator to auto calculate  (crunch) the numbers/results. 

My players  LOVED those old critical charts.

Would anyone find a use for this?

Aw shucks, guys. 

I'd have to make 100% original material in order to charge for it or even ask for donations PLUS Chaosium permission  (which isn't likely?)

Besides, I just want new comers to the system to have a wealth of free material options to (hopefully) help in their own campaigns. Nothing but love.

CNOWWMW (Complete Netbook of Witches and Warlocks MW edition ) is now available here:

http://basicroleplaying.org/files/file/518-complete-netbook-of-witches-and-warlocks-magic-world-edition/

I'm old fashioned and would like to see it stay as is however Trifletraxor is correct. This isn't a BRP only site and while I'd rather see people drawn to THAT system and share my love of it, Worlds of Wonder is all encompassing and an attractive title. My only concern is people finding it in Google search. It's been brought up in another thread that several companies have the Worlds of Wonder title on sites...

Type in BRPcentral and it stands at top of list.

So while I chose to have it remain as is, I don't really mind Worlds of Wonder.

A lot of material here is not represented by Chaos either...

Alright. Thanks guys. Good advice!

No Wizards of the Coast trademark in my signiture.  :P 

37 minutes ago, Baulderstone said:

Pffff. Next you will expect me to believe you don't make any money doing all this.

 

Lol Lol! Even the people who make money doing this don't make money.

Sorry to be a crab Trif,  but I noticed occasionally when I quote someone in a post, then later try to quote someone else the comment pops up with the first quote instead of the second and I can't erase / fix it. Thought it was just my browser acting funny again but I've had the same results on other browsers.

All mobile BTW.

Anyone else have this issue?

12 minutes ago, auyl said:

Aww  think I might cry 

Don't cry. Converting is tiresome, boring,  repetitive, and tedious. I really only do stuff I'm going to use in my own campaigns. Not for the joy. 

Might take a break for a bit then work on fixing the other Manual of Monsters to look more like the Folio...

Wow. Not sure what next project will be... Been awhile since I didn't have SOMETHING to work on...

Almost done with Complete Netbook of Witches and Warlocks. Just gotta pretty it up a bit. Trifletraxor will have to upload it for me because of its size. (Sorry Trif) Probably  shoot him a dropbox link tomorrow.

Hey Trif, is there a way to delete custome streams? I messed up and doubled some before I knew what I was doing...

If there's a vote, I'm for Worlds of Wonder but the acronym might confuse some.

I'm leaning towards adding new sub-Allegiances to the current three. Worshipping a deity who's alligned with Light, say Zeus,  would allow an allegiance to Zeus that goes hand in hand with Light but has different rules for raising /lowering allegiance scores as well as different benefits for apotheosis.

Sorry. This new update hates me and since Im no longer a mod I can't erase a double post. that's  a good explanation Baulderstone. But that seems even more complex then what I'm trying to do.

18 hours ago, Vexthug said:

I would make it a skill like piety from MRQ2. Bonuses and penalties can be added depending on your allegiance score and your gods allegiance.

Passions from RQ6 is also another way of doing this, and could be a lot less book keeping.

Just my 2 cents, I like to keep my games simple so the less fiddly the better.

Keep up the good work, I've enjoyed all the stuff you've done so far

Miles

I was also Thinking this was getting a bit crunchy. Can you tell me A little about RQ6 passions?

It would be nice if there was a button that automatically loads your custom stream instead of having to go through the drop down menues to find it.

Woah! I really don't like a roll determining how a players character should act. If I'm reading your description correctly if a character comes into a situation where they want to act outside of their "passion" a roll is required to do so. I can't do that.

I much more prefer rewards/punishments for acting in favor of or against their Allegiance. Players have incentive to act in certain ways but are by no means required to.

In the case of my Witch occupation,  she strives to please her deity who grants her power. But if she does something contrary to her belief system (allegiance) she may "fall from grace".

In any case that choice is the players. Not based on a roll against her allegiance.

6 minutes ago, Vexthug said:

I would make it a skill like piety from MRQ2. Bonuses and penalties can be added depending on your allegiance score and your gods allegiance.

Passions from RQ6 is also another way of doing this, and could be a lot less book keeping.

Just my 2 cents, I like to keep my games simple so the less fiddly the better.

Keep up the good work, I've enjoyed all the stuff you've done so far

Miles

I was also Thinking this was getting a bit crunchy. Can you tell me A little about RQ6 passions?

On Fri Oct 23 2015 02:35:31 GMT-0500, skenderax said:

Wish you nice day,

I need advice from you :-).

I want to play a game, where all players are kings. The game should be divided to rounds of year or so.

I there a mechanic, a rules or something, to build a kingdom? To mine, harvest, build fortress, build army, conquere ... in BPR?

 

Thanks.

Sx.

555

Ive created a set of house  rules for just this. Hope it helps.

Ghttp://basicroleplaying.org/files/file/490-domicile-to-domain/

I see you can filter results of new content with tags. Anyway of filtering OUT specific threads.

While I welcome the Gloranthanites they are quite active and I have to scroll past oodles of posts about Glorantha that I'm just not very interested in.