raymond_turney

Dark Light Cost: 1 Point Duration: Episode This spell is like a Light spell, except that the light it creates is only visible to the caster and anyone in Mind Link with him. Others are left still in the dark. Digest Scroll I, III Cost: 1 Point Duration: Until One Scroll Has Been Eaten and Digested This spell allows the caster to eat a scroll, reducing the time needed to read it to the time needed to eat it. This spell also allows the caster to roll twice on each roll to read the scroll, and take the better result. Digest Scroll III gives the best of three rolls, and allows the caster to read scrolls in a written language he does not know, as if he knew the language. Ritual Beheading, I, II, III Cost: 1 Point for I, 2 Points for II, 3 points for III Special: One use, consumed when ta head is added to the collection Duration: Indefinite This spell allows the caster to capture some of the knowledge of the beheaded character. Ritual Beheading I captures oneof the victim’s skills or spells, with a loss 0f -5 to casting skill. Ritual Beheading II captures two of the victim’s skills or spells, with a loss 0f -5 to casting skill. Ritual Beheading Iii captures three of the victim’s skills or spells, with a loss 0f -5 to casting skill. This spell does not capture shamanic skills, such as spirit combat or discorporation. It can be used to capture a shaman’s Tradition Lore. It can effectivel capture sorcery skills or spells. Divine Magic spells are regained using the head’s cult lore, but no more than one head can regain divine spells at a time. The caster must take time out to regain the spell as if he or she was regaining the spell herself, since a severed head cannot regain magic on its own. Heads cannot act on their own, nor may their spells or skills be increased with experience checks. Spells from diferent heads cannot be combined. Casting a spell from a head is an action, and severed heads do not act independently. Spells cast by a head may be combined with spells cast by the caster of Ritual Beheading. This knowledge can only be called upon if the character is within divine magic casting range of the severed head. Thus users of this spell cannot capture a lot of heads and leave them at a far away base. On the other hand, they do not have to display them on their belts, either. This spell makes a good combination with Shrink Head, below. If the head is destroyed, the caster loses the abilities associated with it. If the head is destroyed, the caster may regain ritual beheading. Ritual beheading preserves the bones of the head separated from its body indefinitely. Shrink Head Cost: 1 Point Duration: Permanent This spell shrinks a head that has been ritually beheaded to a size of about an inch, to make it easier to hide. It has no other effect.

Hi, The question here is, what groups have problems that BRP answers and other systems do not? After all, one someone has learned D&D, why should they pay the costs involved in learning a new system? If you're in a group with mostly power gamers and butt kickers it is not clear that switching to a more realistic set of rules will be worth the cost of learning those rules. If anything, having a lot of the decisions made for the players by the class and level system, and having a clearly defined scenario - go into a dugngeon kill some things grab some loot and get out, may make D&D more useful to these groups than any of the advantages offered by BRP. Other groups like to go for the newest thing ... they are easy enough to talk into trying something new and cool. Of course, since BRP has been around since 1984, it is not new and it doesn't have the kind of new features that make some groups consider Spirit of the Century or Exalted cool. BRP does not have advantages. But if these advantages are not what GM's and players already know they want, it is not clear that it is really a great idea for non-BRP players to replace their game with a BRP game. So you have to figure out how to reach the small fraction of GM's and players that these advantages outweigh the costs of switching systems. Ray,

Hi, First started with RQ, before the first edition, back in 1976-77. That was a long time ago. Ray,

Hi, It's worth thinking a bit about the issue of why divine magic was one use. Divine Magic was one use for initiates to make priesthood a magical equivalent of rune lordship, creating a system in which priests were a lot better than initiates. In effect, it was assumed that most divine spells would be cast by priests. Having noticed that this did not work in RQ, in my new system I created multiple levels of divine magic, with some generic divine spells available to initiates and some better divine spells reserved for acolytes and above. Other people did other things. A lot of other people did nothing at all. Remember that an amazing number of people managed to play Old D&D, although when they got together at conventions, it turned out that they did not agree on what Old D&D was. In my definitely biased view, RuneQuest was much clearer than Old D&D, but there was no shortage of problems with it. For what it is worth, I tend to think that it is a good idea to try to keep divine magic as mathematically simple as possible. Sorcery is potentially very powerful and works quite well as a system for power gamers who don't mind math. There is no obvious advantage to making Divine Magic more like Sorcery. People who are interested in my current views on magic systems, etc can download a free copy of Fire and Sword, here, the short version of Fire and Sword, here, or my designer's commentary, here. Ray,

Hi, His remark seemed to me to be reasonable, if tactless. Print is more costly to produce, though it is easier to read from cover to cover. I assume they are using the PDF sales to determine whether it would be profitable to produce a print run. If you buy a PDF when you would rather have a printed version, then don't buy the printed version, you reduce the number of printed copies that will be sold for a given number of PDF's produced. If you wait for the print version, it may never arrive. Buying the PDF and then having it printed at a local printshop doesn't get you out of paying twice, you just pay two different people. Also, the best fonts for pdfs and books are different. In my new game, Fire and Sword, I ended up providing links to Wikipedia for Monster descriptions. This is a less effective tactic in a printed book. Let's face it, in some ways business is harder than writing a role playing game:) I'm not much of a businessman, so I just put my new game, Fire and Sword up in PDF form at BRP Central and let anyone who wants to download it download it. There is a modest assortment of other stuff as well, available here. It should be noted that this is not an ideal strategy, since it doesn't help to keep me alive. As a result, the game gets only a limited amount of my energy. Also, the game gets only a limited amount of advertising and exposure. It is likely that if Fire and Sword has useful ideas that they will find their way into the design mainstream, but I won't get much from it. Anyway, 2700 copies of various editions of Fire and Sword have been downloaded, which suggests that there may be enough interest to create a printed version. At this point, I'm wondering about the best strategy for doing that, etc. One approach is to just a version that uses fonts appropriate for printing, and does not rely on outside links, make that available on the web, etc. A second possible strategy is to make another version of the game to sell as a PDF, and find a way to sell before the latest edition PDF {maye at $4 to $8} and a print version. RosenMcStern, do you have any advice to offer me on my next move? Ray,

Downloads: A new file has been added by raymond_turney: Fire and Sword Fourth Edition with some typos corrected Hi, A version of Fourth Edition with some typos corrected. Ray,

Hi, Just added Fire and Sword fourth edition. It is a lot like third edition, but fixes the problems noticed by readers here, and adds a variety of additional points - virtue points, vice points and prowess points, to track character actionas and their effects on reputation. The new table for the prices of things has been incorporated into fourth edition, Enjoy, Ray,

Hi, Have produced an improved price list of commonly used items in Fire and Sword, and post it in both PDF and RTF format in the files section. This will probably be in Fourth Edition, after some revision, but it seemed like it might be useful to other now. Use the PDF if you want it to look nice, use the RTF if you want to add items. If problems are found, please post a comment here so I can fix them. If you want more items added to the list, please tell me and I will be happy to do that. Note: the price list includes both a price to buy the item and an FTE level at which it is simply assumed that the character has one if he wants one. Ray,

Hi, Thanks to Tywyll for finding the issues in the preceding post. Did anyone else find any problems with Fire and Sword that need to be fixed in the next version. Thanks, Ray,

Hi, The data you asked about seems to be missing. Will post an updated version {4th edition} soon with your requested data. The rules on increasing characteristics are different. Figure you can only increase Power until the next version comes out. Ray,

Hi, A character has a number of magic points equal to his or her POW, which may be increased by MP storage items. MP are regained at a rate of 1/4 POW per day, up if the number is evenly divisible by 2 but not 4. Characters roll to increase POW as if POW were a skill. I'll look and see if this information really is missing from the current edition, and put it in 4th edition if it is not now in there. Ray.

Hi. Made some changes to the Combat Exploits, and added it to combat table. Uploaded new version of Combat Table. Ray,

On my character sheets, I have two different sections that refer to fame points and infamy points. I will use examples from Zojila, my current top character One gives the total balance: Fame {6-1 infamy point} Will 5+3+3 {this quest only} 11/2 Zojila is on a Heroquest at the moment, she started with eleven Will, 5 from fame points, 3 from offices: Minor Carmanian saint, - Kivrin, earned on plague resistance quest Vizier {FTE 9} in House Artabanes Initiate of Deezola and 3 as a special one time grant from the GM for doing better than expected on the quest she was on {she fought the Black Death, and managed in the village she was in to save one person and herself, and keep the priest alive long enough to bury all the others}. The source of the fame and infamy points are recorded lower on the character sheet: 1. Mystifying a demon twice, and the enemy skipper once, during a fight with a Crassus warship on (1/22/06) 2. .5 for being present with the party at the Kallikos White Sea temple defense 3. .5 fame point for summoning Meerclaw and Vorgo on the Hero Plane, winning a lost battle against air tigers and allowing Ma to send for reinforcements. 4. 1 fame point for completing a substantial heroquest {quest to rescue Mira and bring back Dragon’s Egg}. 5. 1 fame point for completing the chasing the quest to frustrate Charg’s theft of Bull Shah Imperial Regalia 6. One fame point for Plague Resisance HeroQuest, combating the plague and becoming a minorCarmaniansaint, patron of milkmaids. 7. 1 fame point for being a vizier in House Artabanes Reason for Infamy Point 1. At a reception for the Moonshadows held to honor their arrival in Zern with Countess Yolanella as hostess, fell down at Countess Yolanella entrance {she was too drunk to stand}, then declined one of Countess Yolanella’s servants arms with a muttered “Damn Carmanians”. So to me it was obvious that a player should record the history of his or her characters, and how they got the fame points, infamy points, etc. The problem is that the system is evolving, and I don't know how to make use of the details. I should probably include a note to the effect that a GM can use this history in bringing characters into adventures, and that a GM can deny credit for Fame points if the player cannot remember what his or her character is famous for. Ray,

Hi, Trefletraxor, what do you mean by a famous/infamous scale? Symmetry with some infamy point rules? The key idea here, though it may not be obvious, is that fame points are the major component of status and thus influence, and also gives Will for Legenday quests. So fame points may be misleadingly named. So could you rephrase your earlier suggestion? Ray,

Added to the rules: Prowess Points Prowess points are awarded when a character does something that meets one of the requirements for a fame point, but not all of them. An example would be a sorcerer killing 15 people with a Fire Rain spell. This does not demonstrate the kind of admired courage that a warrior who kills a dragon does. But if the sorcerer kills enough people with big Fire Rain spells, he will become known as tough. So his action should be recognized. The gamemaster awards prowess points at the end of each session. A gamemaster should usually award at most 1-prowess point every three sessions or so, per character. Prowess points reward exceptional performance, not the normal performance expected of a character contributing to the success of a session. When a character accumulates ten prowess points, his or her player can trade them in for a fame point. Prowess points have no other effect. comments anyone?

Hi, The third edition is now out. A 4th edition is planned. It will contain some version of roleplaying extension to cover passions, virtues and vices. The idea is to integrate these into the more "powergame" aspects of the rules, and leave room for characters to evolve in play. If anyone else has any ideas to offer in this area, I'll be happy to consider them. A few other things like a much more extensive price list giving the FTE/grade level at which things become available is also planned. Am currently thinking of rewriting magic item creation and tables so it is clear how to make all magic items in the tables, and what the base cost and level of availability of the items are. A printed version available from Lulu is being considered. It would have cover and chapter art, etc. The City of Tirhrei supplement is fitfully being expanded. Does anyone have any ideas on what would help Fire and Sword users most? Thinking of adding an introductory scenario and and an Orkpak. Coments anyone? Ray,

For my next campaign, I'm thinking of going over to 1D6+3 experience checks at the end of each adventure. I'm also thinking of stealing an idea from Spirit of the Century, which SoC calls aspects. I'll call them tags. These are prominent things about a character, rash, talkative, etc. When a player does something that is "in character", but not wargame optimal, the character gets an experience check, up to a limit of three checks per session. A character could start out with up to 5 tags. The idea is to encourage players who help the GM a little by acting in character, without this becoming totally crucial to successful power gaming {characters whose players who can manage to bring characterization into play will tend, over time, to have a wider variety of skills, but 1D6+3 basic checks, suitably invested in combat skills, should insure that hack and slash characters are still possible}. I'm open to ideas for complicating experience generally, if something is gained by doing so. Since you roll experience only once per session, complexity in this are is much less costly than complexity in the combat rules. I've also considered adding edges from Saage Worlds, and good old RQ experience in what a character uses. What do other people think?