Jump to content

Hyperlexic

Regulars
  • Content Count

    30
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

16 Good

About Hyperlexic

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Converted

  • RPG Biography
    Sequentially: OD&D, AD&D, Traveller, Champions, Rolemaster, Runequest, hiatus, HW/HQ, Rolemaster SS, 3.5, 5E
  • Current games
    5E Eberron
  • Location
    Berkeley, CA, USA
  • Blurb
    Blarb

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Hi all - Picking up from my former thread... https://basicroleplaying.org/topic/11023-using-hq-in-the-lunar-empire-tips-tricks-and-homebrew/ I just reread the Lunar magic section (starting page 179 of the Heroquest: Glorantha edition) and the example of Magatheus on p55; I scanned the Seven Mothers section and the Illumination section but haven’t reread closely yet. In any case, here’s my understanding on how to create a Lunar character in HQ:G - please confirm/correct: 1. Lunar magic stems from the character’s Moon Rune a. This is one of the 3 tunes that the character
  2. Thanks all for the comments! You’ve all given me quite a bit to think about... and I need to reread some material, notably the Lunar parts of HQ:G. I seem to remember the Lunar magic seeming designed for existing characters converting to it, especially the moon alignment, but maybe I just didn’t understand it. I’ll reread.
  3. Thanks, Joerg. I assume this is Herr Baumgartner. I probably should have been more specific in my brief ask - I’m most interested in specifically HQ rules items, since HQ:G defaults the player creation in particular to Dragon Pass. I’ll definitely have to think about the “clan rating” idea. That’s a good option. I agree with you comments about the Champions in the HW material, both the pros and cons.
  4. Hi all - I am (once again) thinking of setting a game in the Lunar Empire. I thought I’d see if people have any advice or material for how best to use HQ for this. I have to re-read the Lunar magic portion of HQ:G and may have more specific questions after that. I also have the old Hero Wars / Issaries Lunar books and will look back at that, for cult structure etc if nothing else. Similarly I’d be very interested in any home brew materials or personal setting/rules info. Thanks in advance! Hyperlexic
  5. I think one thing - a lot of these rules seem to work really well for 1:1 duels, it's harder in the chaos of a mass melee with movement, ambushes/flanking, etc.
  6. Boy you have that right. To be clear I'm totally comfortable adapting my own version of this to run at the table. I just usually want to understand the rules as written first... I think in total - I don't really love this initiative system. The whole Statement of Intent system seems really cludgy. And the fact that we're missing reach (size and weapon length) and speed lead to some pretty odd results (e.g., a really large fast fighter with a long weapon could possibly attack 3x in a round; a really small fast person with a small weapon couldn't). I'm going to look back at RQ6
  7. Ok so, just to wrap up this thread: - There isn’t a good example / actual play that anyone is aware of - The basic approach in rules as written is: * Declare Statement of Intent at the beginning of the round - including the SR count (eg “I’ll fire and arrow on SR 3 at Enemy 1 and again on SR 11 at Enemy 1) * Over the course of the round the GM counts up the SR’s and events unfold * If a declared SoI becomes invalid, the round is wasted (though apparently this is commonly houseruled) Is this all correct?
  8. Right - I'm just wondering what the rules as written really mean, and going back to my original question - any example of how this really plays out. Is there a good actual play recording?
  9. So basic question: can things change from the Statement of Intent, as played out on a per strike rank basis? E.g. let's assume that both Player 1 and Player 2 declare their SoI to be 'I'm hitting Enemy 1'. Player 1 strikes first on SR5 and drops SoI; then on SR6 Player 2 comes up - can he/she change their action or does the whole action get invalidated? You can imagine many other similar examples.
  10. Thanks to various people for their comments. I guess my fundamental question is: should we be using D&D style turn order in RQ:Q - where basically we just decide who acts in what order, and each person in turn takes their complete action? Or are we supposed to be counting off strike ranks? Each approach seems to have issues. Somehow we didn't seem to have this issue 25-30 years ago when playing RQ3, but maybe that's just because we didn't try to apply the rules too closely.
  11. I ran my first RQ game in ~20 years yesterday and I have the distinct feeling that I am totally misusing the strike rank system. The mix between move (one strike rank per Movement Unit) and other actions turned the whole thing into some sort of strike rank-based chess match. Is there a writeup or actual play somewhere of how this is supposed to work?
  12. Debates on RQ3 vs RQ:G and the relative merits of random vs assigned characteristics aside, I’d welcome any comments on assigned characteristic methods. It occurs to me that my method ends up higher than the rolled method (average 12 ignoring SIZ/INT effect vs average 10.5 randomly), and also doesn’t fully reflect the diversity of rolls you’re going to get randomly, so here’s a revision: 1) Assign these 7 stats: 6, 8, 10, 11,12, 13, 15 2) Add 3 to one of SIZ or INT, add 2 to the other (max 18 after these) 3) Add 3 points anywhere as per normal rules for being 92 or below
×
×
  • Create New...