glassneedles Posted July 17, 2021 Share Posted July 17, 2021 4 hours ago, David Scott said: There is a general QuestWorlds group, and Ian posts from his personal account as Chaosium isn't his day job. Crossposting from Facebook isn't possible, likewise wading through the non-linear way FB orders messages searching for Ian's posts is time consuming. Copying a thread is messy and always needs editing (I've only blanked names): Thanks for doing that David, it's very much appreciated. I understand crossposting takes extra time and I'd much rather you guys work on new material rather than making sure every social media format is fully updated. Also didn't realise Quest World was on Github! I am already on there so shall check it out. Thanks for the tip 🙂 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Posted July 23, 2021 Share Posted July 23, 2021 Version 0.95 is up at https://github.com/ChaosiumInc/QuestWorlds/blob/master/docs/QuestWorlds.pdf 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Posted August 2, 2021 Share Posted August 2, 2021 Sequences update. Version 0.962 is up at https://github.com/ChaosiumInc/QuestWorlds/blob/master/docs/QuestWorlds.pdf 2 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hteph Posted August 6, 2021 Share Posted August 6, 2021 I'm not sure I follow the "5.2 Sequence" stuff, there are appearances of "Resource" here and there, like in 5.2.2 Scored Sequence Outcomes and in 5.2.1.2 Resource Point Knowledge I assume it should be Resolution Point instead ... or have I missed something from earlier in the document? I would rise a Github issue but I'm uncertain if I missed some connection. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hteph Posted August 6, 2021 Share Posted August 6, 2021 I'm also a bit uncertain on the 5.3 Wagered rules. As you lose AP calculated from your own wager unrelated to the opponents wager, is there ever a reason for betting more than one? Wasn't it the opponents bet that you lost back in HW days? <Trying to find my HW books> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard S. Posted August 6, 2021 Share Posted August 6, 2021 3 hours ago, Hteph said: I'm also a bit uncertain on the 5.3 Wagered rules. As you lose AP calculated from your own wager unrelated to the opponents wager, is there ever a reason for betting more than one? Wasn't it the opponents bet that you lost back in HW days? <Trying to find my HW books> It's worded a little weirdly in the SRD, but I believe the intent is still the same as in HQ1, where both sides stand to lose the same amount of AP. So if you only bet 1 AP sure you'll take barely any "damage" if you lose, but if you win your opponent will also take barely any. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hteph Posted August 6, 2021 Share Posted August 6, 2021 It will probably be easier to parse with an example in the finished book. But perhaps an editorial pass could be done, because I find it a bit difficult to understand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.