Kloster

IIRC, this was to be able to go from one side to the other on horse.

Consider that stolen.

Atlatl is described (RQG p 211) as projectile, but the chart p 212 puts it with the javelin (as thrown). One more ambiguous point to correct.

This one is nice, not dumb.

Yep, same art. I haven't noticed any difference., except for the scenario.

What we did is use RQ3 RAW, forcing players and GM to be creative in the use of maneuvers to beat others. This was intellectually very interesting.

I've just browsed quickly, and haven't seen any. I am now at work and can't answer more properly.

I finally got my hands on the new french RQG, just 1 hour before the 'stay at home' order. It seems I will have more than enough time to study it.

Who's the 4th team?

Not sure, Humakt didn't kill Orlanth.

If Humakt can cut family kinship, I think he can also cut a bond. Ask your local sword of Humakt to cut the bond (without killing anybody, of course).

What we did with RQ3 was doing the Statement of Intent in ascending INT order, and then, for each SR, action in descending DEX order, exactly for this reason.

That way, the only info that could leak is the number of ballots. This seems fine to me.

It is legit. It's up to the GM to decide if he (or Yelmalio) accept it, but RAW, it is OK. For me, the question is: "They can't learn Firearrow, but can they use a Firearrow matrix?". That way, the munchkin rules lawyer does not even need a pal. RAW, it seems yes to me, it works.

Cumae is a Greek colony in Italy, and for western Europe, end of iron age is considered to be the roman conquest of 1st century BC.

According to Heron and Biton, the 'advanced' gastraphetes (greek belly crossbow) were created before 420 BC by a guy named Zopyros for the siege of Cumae and Ctesibus describes it around 250 BC. There is no more precise date, but 420 BC is early iron age, so the basic models can easily be from late bronze age.

Completely agree here. In fact, in France, beginning tabulation before the official end of the voting time frame can drive you to jail, and publishing anything between 24 before start of voting time and the end of voting time carry hefty fines.

Same for me.

Yes, I know that rule (coming from RQ3, if not earlier). I agree with you. What I said is that earth oil has a very low probability of catching fire in case the lamp is broken. Most probably around 1 or 2%. In a magical world, as you said, everything can go.

A petroleum lamp, yes (I inadvertently did it myself). An oil lamp, almost impossible. Cold oil is very difficult to ignite.

Yes, because it is already hot. Cold (i.e. room temperature) oil is much more difficult to ignite.

Molotov cocktails were efficient when used from above, because WW2 tanks were not sealed, and burning liquids went inside the vehicle, which itself was full of oil, gasoline vapors and explosives. The heat in itself was sometime sufficient to ignite the shells or their propellant. But of course, it is using flammable products not available in bronze, or even iron age, not speaking of those built by Frederic Joliot-Curie as can be seen in 'Is Paris burning' movie: a chemistry nobel prize with access to one of the worlds most advanced lab, he made truly efficient homemade weapons.

As I'm living somewhere voting early is unknown, I would keep only the last 2 parts, but YES, YES, YES.

Of course. Same for me.

I went the other way. Wanting to use all those combat options, I reverted to RQ3 combat. Those options were, for us: 1/ what made the combats more tactical and interesting. 2/ what avoided us the /attack/parry until a critical occurs for high level.