Jump to content

RW Bronze Age archaeology


Squaredeal Sten

Recommended Posts

17 hours ago, svensson said:

They weren't Epicurean philosophers exploring the meaning of sensation. It just gluttony, nothing more.

If they were doing that, they weren't Epicurean philosophers they were hedonists. For Epicureans, the supreme good they sought was ataraxia or the freedom from pain. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Bren said:

If they were doing that, they weren't Epicurean philosophers they were hedonists. For Epicureans, the supreme good they sought was ataraxia or the freedom from pain. 

Fair enough. I'd confused the two because of 'epicureanism's' more common definition. As for ataraxia, isn't that more a sense of oneness, spiritual stillness or tranquility based on the freedom from fear?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, svensson said:

Fair enough. I'd confused the two because of 'epicureanism's' more common definition. As for ataraxia, isn't that more a sense of oneness, spiritual stillness or tranquility based on the freedom from fear?

Apikoros "Epicurean" is the Hebrew word for "heretic", replacing the earlier term minim ("sectarians") once the division between Christian and Jew became established.

Nowadays the more common term in Aramaic, Hebrew and languages like Yiddish is derived from zindiq, a Persian term that means "follower of the Zend(-Avesta), i.e. Zoroastrian" - it was borrowed into Arabic as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, svensson said:

Fair enough. I'd confused the two because of 'epicureanism's' more common definition.

If you had said, epicureans instead of "Epicurean philosophers" I would have assumed the common definition. Epicurean philosophers get a bad rap in the modern world. So when someone is wrong on the internet, duty calls

Quote

As for ataraxia, isn't that more a sense of oneness, spiritual stillness or tranquility based on the freedom from fear?

Tranquility does sound closer. I was going off my recollection from a long ago Introduction to Philosophy class. You're correct that it was more than just freedom from fear. As I recall, their ideal seemed to be living simply, eating simple food, not drinking to excess, and studying mathematics so as to avoid worry, stress, and pain in life. I particularly remember the math part as I majored in math, so I found the Epicureans advocating studying math amusing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

A video about experimental archaeology of Bronze Age Mesopotamian textile production. deduced from cloth impressions on clay seals.

I had no idea that a larger spindle weight produces thicker thread.yarn.  Info about when shearing time is -  you want to shear the sheep before the new fleece grows into the old fleece -  this implies a seasonality to the work in Ernalda temples' loom houses. 

Also think of larger textiles than the "2 meter" (by 1m) pieces of cloth given as a standard in W&E.  These large pieces in the RW as discussed in the video may have been a regional specialty.

The discussion of speed of production of these large textiles  has implications for cost.

Also, of course, a lot about letters sent, their clay envelopes,  

 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Cassius said:

On this webpage, some items one can see in the French National Archeology Museum. There are belts, armours, cups, swords, etc.

 

 

05-bronze-centuren_2_bis_copie.jpg

That bronze belt is unlike anything ancient that I have seen before.  And it shows wire work holding the pendants, which I doubt would be done by casting alone, so there was lots of hammer work there and possibly wire drawing.  Also the uniformity of the pieces indicates to me that division of labor in the workshop possibly occurred.  Does it look that way to you?  To me, the beauty is in the concept, not the individual pieces of the belt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know enough about ancient art to judge it as well as you do but I see what you mean and I agree with you : the concept in itself is beautiful.

I was impressed too by the Saint-Germain-du-Plain's cuirass but I can't find anymore a full and satisfying picture of it.

This item, a boar's canine swaddled in a bronze jewel, looks very Gloranthan to me. It is assumed that some women wore it on their belt. Could it be a protection of their fertility ?

 

01-bronze-92-000166_copie.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cassius said:

I don't know enough about ancient art to judge it as well as you do but I see what you mean and I agree with you : the concept in itself is beautiful.

I was impressed too by the Saint-Germain-du-Plain's cuirass but I can't find anymore a full and satisfying picture of it.

This item, a boar's canine swaddled in a bronze jewel, looks very Gloranthan to me. It is assumed that some women wore it on their belt. Could it be a protection of their fertility ?

 

01-bronze-92-000166_copie.jpg

As I recall pigs are associated with Ernalda.  So a boar's tusk would be a cult oriented ornament.  I don't recall a reference for the tie in to fertility. 

With the loops at each end I could see a thong attached to be worn around the neck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Squaredeal Sten said:

With the loops at each end I could see a thong attached to be worn around the neck.

Rougly translated from the Museum website :

Quote

Specialists have long been divided over its use: pectoral or tiara? These two hypotheses collide with its position in the tomb, at the right hip level, and the fact that the rare known examples were all found at the bottom of the torso. For this reason, it is now thought that it may have been the main element of a complex support, suspended from a belt or garment.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cassius said:

Rougly translated from the Museum website :

 

So the equivalent of a buckle, only for a sash?  It is conceivable.  But my own  experience of tying a sash is that it does not need a buckle.  You would only need such a thing if you were incompetent at tying the sash.

Right hip  ... always the right hip?  Perhaps part of a closure system for an upper garment?  Using ties instead of a hook?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/8/2023 at 8:52 PM, Bren said:

If you had said, epicureans instead of "Epicurean philosophers" I would have assumed the common definition. Epicurean philosophers get a bad rap in the modern world.

"Do you like a nice garden? Do you enjoy the company of friends? Do you believe the world is made of tiny particles, which you call 'atoms'? Do you trust the evidence of your senses? Do you find politics tiresome, and raise a skeptical eyebrow at those who live in fear of God?

If your answer to these questions is 'yes', you might want to consider becoming an Epicurean."
History of Philosophy Without Any Gaps podcast

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Squaredeal Sten said:

So the equivalent of a buckle, only for a sash?  It is conceivable.  But my own  experience of tying a sash is that it does not need a buckle.  You would only need such a thing if you were incompetent at tying the sash.

Right hip  ... always the right hip?  Perhaps part of a closure system for an upper garment?  Using ties instead of a hook?  

Perhaps something tossed in by a funeral attendee prior to burial?

SDLeary

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...