nyx_xyn Posted December 4, 2023 Share Posted December 4, 2023 Page 41, Fast Talk reads "...use the Bargain or Persuade skills (pages 41 and 50)." Suggested edit: "...use the Bargain or Persuade skills (pages 39 and 48)." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nyx_xyn Posted December 4, 2023 Share Posted December 4, 2023 Page 38, Augments and Complementary Skills sidebar, the second sentence of the Augment half reads "complementary skill to support , or augment,..." Suggested edit: "complementary skill to support, or augment,..." (remove space after "support") Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nyx_xyn Posted December 4, 2023 Share Posted December 4, 2023 Page 47, Medicine reads "Use this skill is used to diagnose..." Suggested edit: "Use this skill is used to diagnose..." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WisdomOfWombat Posted December 17, 2023 Share Posted December 17, 2023 In the Handouts Pack on page 3 the sentence "Characters’ lives are measured in hit points. These are lost through injuries and other harmful situations. When a living being runs out of hit points, they die." is doubled. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dangermouse Posted December 31, 2023 Share Posted December 31, 2023 Exceeding 100% in a skill - Page 119 There's a conflict in the text which says: "Only successful experience rolls can increase skills beyond 100%. If your character has 100% or higher in a skill, you must roll over 100 on D100 for your character to succeed at an experience roll, which means that the experience modifier is necessary. No matter how much over 100% the skill has risen, any roll of 100 or over earns a skill improvement." So is it a roll greater than 100 to improve or a roll greater than or equal to 100? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ravenheart87 Posted January 1 Share Posted January 1 On 12/31/2023 at 12:06 PM, Dangermouse said: Exceeding 100% in a skill - Page 119 There's a conflict in the text which says: "Only successful experience rolls can increase skills beyond 100%. If your character has 100% or higher in a skill, you must roll over 100 on D100 for your character to succeed at an experience roll, which means that the experience modifier is necessary. No matter how much over 100% the skill has risen, any roll of 100 or over earns a skill improvement." So is it a roll greater than 100 to improve or a roll greater than or equal to 100? Yeah, the last part should be over too. That's why you need an experience modifier: you can't roll over 100 on d100 without it. Quote Wielder of the Vorpal Mace. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason D Posted January 10 Share Posted January 10 Hey all - Thank you for your diligent error-catching. I'm working on a new version of the .pdf for a new print run, and will be incorporating many, if not all, of these corrections and we'll be releasing an errata document shortly. Best, Jason 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saki Posted January 11 Share Posted January 11 Thank you Jason - I am very interested in the errata document! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saki Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 On page 187, the book indicates that you should reference the Skill Training Costs on page 119. Page 119 doesn't have this section, and the section fully doesn't exist in BRP:UGE (Though it was in the BGB). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason D Posted January 31 Share Posted January 31 I'm going to draw a line here and note that everything prior to this post has been considered for implementation or after much thought, rejected. A new .pdf is being prepared soon. Like any work of this size and scope, it is bound to have some errors still, but it is a much cleaner and error-free document than it was upon release. Thank you all for your contributions! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndreJarosch Posted January 31 Share Posted January 31 20 minutes ago, Jason D said: I'm going to draw a line here and note that everything prior to this post has been considered for implementation or after much thought, rejected. A new .pdf is being prepared soon. Like any work of this size and scope, it is bound to have some errors still, but it is a much cleaner and error-free document than it was upon release. Thank you all for your contributions! I assume a revised PRINT edition will be a few years from now? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DreadDomain Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 8 hours ago, Jason D said: I'm going to draw a line here and note that everything prior to this post has been considered for implementation or after much thought, rejected. A new .pdf is being prepared soon. Like any work of this size and scope, it is bound to have some errors still, but it is a much cleaner and error-free document than it was upon release. Thank you all for your contributions! Thanks! Can't wait to see the new pdf or even just the errata file. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saki Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 Thanks Jason, I'm excited to see the revision. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason D Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 On 1/31/2024 at 6:51 PM, AndreJarosch said: I assume a revised PRINT edition will be a few years from now? We're sending the updated file to the printers in the next few days, so much sooner. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndreJarosch Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 7 hours ago, Jason D said: We're sending the updated file to the printers in the next few days, so much sooner. Oh, you bad boys. You know i will buy this second printrun in addition to the book i already have, don´t you? 😉 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SDLeary Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 @Jason D, will there be an addition to the cover, front or back, that calls out the fact that its a second printing? SDLeary Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yangtze2000 Posted February 20 Share Posted February 20 Where will the errata doc be posted, please? 🙂 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scout Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 Has an errata document been compiled for the latest print run? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason D Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 On 2/20/2024 at 6:05 PM, yangtze2000 said: Where will the errata doc be posted, please? 🙂 As soon as I can finish it. 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 On pg 24 of the BRP 1.02 pdf the temporary insanity score says it is based on 1/2 of current SAN: Your character’s temporary insanity score (like a Major Wound Threshold) equals 1⁄2 their current SAN. Losing this many SAN points in a five-minute period results in some form of temporary insanity (see page 218). That seems to be in conflict with the information on pg 218: Half the character’s starting SAN is their temporary insanity score (TIS). Though SAN will vary dramatically throughout gameplay, their TIS never changes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yangtze2000 Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 On 3/6/2024 at 1:50 PM, Jason D said: As soon as I can finish it. That's a "when", not a "where" 😄 I just want to know where to subscribe so I don't miss it 🙂 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Professor Phobos Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 There's an entry for "Rifle, Lever-Action" in the weapon descriptions on page 168, but no entry for "Rifle, Lever-Action" appears on the "Modern Missile Weapons" table on page 173. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Susimetsa Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 Any chance of a new errata thread for the 1.03 edition? On page 123, left column: "Those with high DEX ranks make their statements of intent [...] those with low DEX ranks." Missing word indicated. Most likely 'before' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saki Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 Any update on when the Errata document is being released? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.