Jump to content

Out now in PDF: The Smoking Ruin & Other Stories


MOB

Recommended Posts

38 minutes ago, Jeff said:

The point is that name repetition is common. Probably far more common than we make out. 

On the other hand, there is hardly any name repetition in the names of rulers in Glorantha, anywhere. While single name elements are repeated in the Fortunate Succession, we don't get numbered sets of Rhamesis or Tutmosis. The kings of the Heortlings have maybe three names that appear more than once, and similar for the governors of Heortland. Only the Bailifides introduce repeat names into the list of Seshnegi kings.

Telling how it is excessive verbis

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Joerg said:

On the other hand, there is hardly any name repetition in the names of rulers in Glorantha, anywhere. While single name elements are repeated in the Fortunate Succession, we don't get numbered sets of Rhamesis or Tutmosis. The kings of the Heortlings have maybe three names that appear more than once, and similar for the governors of Heortland. Only the Bailifides introduce repeat names into the list of Seshnegi kings.

And? The number of king's lists we have are pretty minimal.

At this point you seem to be looking for something to critique rather than discussing the Smoking Ruin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Joerg said:

On the other hand, there is hardly any name repetition in the names of rulers in Glorantha, anywhere. While single name elements are repeated in the Fortunate Succession, we don't get numbered sets of Rhamesis or Tutmosis. The kings of the Heortlings have maybe three names that appear more than once, and similar for the governors of Heortland. Only the Bailifides introduce repeat names into the list of Seshnegi kings.

Again it seems realistic

How to show you are richer /more educated ? find a "different" name for your children, just to stand out

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, French Desperate WindChild said:

Again it seems realistic

I politely disagree. Just look at real world monarchies and the limited number of names they use. Us Brits now have a George VII coming down the line, our next will be Charles III and his son will be William V. Imagine the insanity in the papers if they risked a King Kevin, King Wayne or Queen Kylie. Not that there’s anything wrong with those names – don’t blame me for the snobbery inherent in the British class system. Even dynasties of the rich have a habit of passing down names. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Cloud64 said:

I politely disagree. Just look at real world monarchies and the limited number of names they use. Us Brits now have a George VII coming down the line, our next will be Charles III and his son will be William V. Imagine the insanity in the papers if they risked a King Kevin, King Wayne or Queen Kylie. Not that there’s anything wrong with those names – don’t blame me for the snobbery inherent in the British class system. Even dynasties of the rich have a habit of passing down names. 

absolutly (like monarchy) ;) but I would prefer examples like "Louis".

In all case, we can conclude that a lot of people with the same name are just ... a normal fact in a "pre medieval background". Of course, few people with the same name would be just ... a normal fact too

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jeff said:

At this point you seem to be looking for something to critique rather than discussing the Smoking Ruin.

Sorry if this came across as needless grumbling.

I meant to admit defeat with my "Vargast Vargastson" post above.

In fact I have complained about the lack of repetition in those king lists long ago.

The ruler lists we have (Kings of the Heortlings, Hendriki kings, Sartar Princes, Tarsh kings, Colymar kings, to name a few) are our main source for male names, and we have a much reduced set of names for females.

There appears to be a Glorantha-wide trend to have similar multi-syllabary names in a dynasty, but introducing variations. As if those names are written in a syllabary where each syllable has something like a runic meaning. Denesiod, Dismesiod - Elmexdros, Karmexdros - Dismanthuyar, Urvanyar, Karvanyar. This is reminiscent of Michael, Gabriel, Uriel, where "-el" is short for "elohim", which probably translates as "the Lord" or "God".

We get quite similar names for close cousins, like Valinyr and Valina of Nochet.

Now there is a chance that something like this is only done for posh names, and that low status people get to have names with fewer syllables.

There are only a few known cases where a leader takes on a different name than his birth name - the masks of Moonson, Sheng Seleris, and I think one or two of the Kralori Emperors are documented as having done so.

 

Getting a handle on how names are generated in the setting is part of the character creation in any fictional setting.

Telling how it is excessive verbis

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also bear in mind there maybe a naming system - like the Scottish naming system (which is dying out), which even has a built in exception system. I'm named David, but should be a John after my paternal grandfather, instead I'm named for a maternal great uncle who died in WWII (as that's an allowed exception). To illustrate to naming variety, My grandfather John was called Jock (it's diminutive in Scotland, Jack in England). So overall just because someone should be a particular name, doesn't mean they are actually called by it in the end.

Edited by David Scott
  • Thanks 1

-----

Search the Glorantha Resource Site: https://wellofdaliath.chaosium.com. Search the Glorantha mailing list archives: https://glorantha.steff.in/digests/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, David Scott said:

Also bear in mind there maybe a naming system - like the Scottish naming system (which is dying out), which even has a built in exception system. I'm named David, but should be a John after my paternal grandfather, instead I'm named for a maternal great uncle who died in WWII (as that's an allowed exception). To illustrate to naming variety, My grandfather John was called Jock (it's diminutive in Scotland, Jack in England). So overall just because someone should be a particular name, doesn't mean they are actually called by it in the end.

Thank you. That is interesting and informative even if I still can’t see how one gets from John to Jack, yes Kennedys I am looking at you! I mean really, Jack F Kennedy, eh, really?

Cheers 

... remember, with a TARDIS, one is never late for breakfast!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Bill the barbarian said:

... I still can’t see how one gets from John to Jack...

John --> Johann --> Jochan --> Joachim --> Jacques --> Jack

(I think there are other paths, too)

  • Confused 1

C'es ne pas un .sig

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/13/2020 at 12:13 PM, MOB said:

In fact, there are three Michaels, we go by MikeMOB, and Michal to make it easier. 

And there are three Davids: David Scott, David Larkins, and David Naylor.

Not to mention all the Js: Jeff, Jason, Jim, Jamie, Julia and John.

Two Jameses... Lowder and Coquillat. 

Not only that, but for many years Chaosium employed a male Lynne and now employs a female Lynne. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...